4.4 Article

Interleukin-1B (IL1B) and interleukin-6 (IL6) gene polymorphisms are associated with risk of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Journal

HEMATOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 98-103

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hon.843

Keywords

chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; cytokines; gene polymorphisms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Common polymorphisms in genes encoding for cytokines implicated in the inflammatory response and Th1/Th2 balance might play a role in the development and prognosis of chronic lymphocytic lenkaemia (CLL). To test the hypothesis, we investigated 13 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in nine of such genes in a population-based case-control study, conducted in the Italian region of Sardinia in 1999-2003. Forty incident CLL cases and 113 population controls were available for study. The following SNPs were selected: IL1A-889C > T, IL1RN 9589A > T, IL1B-31 C > T, IL1B-511 C > T, IL2-384T > G, IL6-174G > C, IL6-597G > A, IL10-1082A > G, IL10-3575T > A, TNF-308G > A, LTA91A > C, LTA 252A > G and CARD15 nt1007. After adjusting by age and gender, individuals homozygous for the IL1B-511T allele run a lower risk of CLL (OR = 0.1, 95% CI 0.0, 0.8, p = 0.032), while risk showed a 4.5-fold increase associated with the genotype homozygous for the IL6-174C allele (OR= 4.5; 95% CI 1.1, 19.3, p = 0.041). Individuals homozygous for the IL6-174C allele and carrying the homozygous IL1B-511C allele showed an 11-fold increase in CLL risk (OR= 11.4,95% CI 1.9,69.4,p = 0.008). None of the other interleukin SNPs evaluated showed any association with CLL risk. Large multicentre pooled studies are warranted, achieving the statistical power required to confirm whether IL6 and IL1B gene polymorphisms might play a role in CLL development and prognosis, as well as the null associations herein reported. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available