3.9 Article

Functional diversity of marine macrobenthic communities from sublittoral soft-sediment habitats off northern Chile

Journal

HELGOLAND MARINE RESEARCH
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 413-424

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1007/s10152-010-0238-8

Keywords

Ecosystem functioning; Biological traits; Upwelling; Invertebrates; Fuzzy coding

Funding

  1. Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
  2. Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanologicas, Universidad de Antofagasta
  3. EU [RUE-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Benthic communities show changes in composition and structure across different environmental characteristics and habitats. However, incorporating species biological traits into the analysis can provide a better understanding of system functioning within habitats. We compare the functional diversity of macrobenthic communities from a contrasting shallow (15 m) and deep (50 m) sublittoral soft-sediment habitats in northern Chile, using biological traits analysis. Our aim was to highlight the biological characteristics responsible for differences between habitats and the implications for ecosystem functioning. Trait analysis showed that the deep habitat was restricted in providing functionally important biogenic structure and bioturbation and supports less diverse feeding-related energy pathways. The shallow habitat is characterized by more diverse energy pathways and a higher potential for matter exchange through bioturbation. We provide support to the predictions of transfer of energy from the benthos to upper trophic levels in the shallow, which is characterized mainly by normoxia and little organic matter content in the sediment. In the deep habitat, characterized by hypoxia and more organic matter, energy appears to be transferred to microbial components. We suggest that trait analysis should be added to the traditional approaches based on species diversity, because it provides indicators of ecosystem stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available