4.4 Article

The effect of left ventricular electrical delay on AV optimization for cardiac resynchronization therapy

Journal

HEART RHYTHM
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages 988-993

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.03.009

Keywords

Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Electrical dyssynchrony; LV pacing site; Left ventricular reverse remodeling; Outcomes

Funding

  1. Boston Scientific Corporation
  2. Boston Scientific
  3. Medtronic
  4. St Jude Medical
  5. Sorin
  6. Sorin Group
  7. Biotronik
  8. Cameron
  9. Biosense Webster
  10. Sanofi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND The role of atrioventricular optimization (AVO) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is controversial. Identifying subgroups that benefit from optimization is important to improve CRT outcomes. Pacing at sites of late electrical activation, as assessed by the QLV interval, improves remodeling with CRT. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether pacing at sites of long left ventricular (LV) electrical delay increases the effectiveness of AVO. METHODS This substudy of the SMART-AV trial included 280 subjects who were randomized to either an electrogram-based AVO (SmartDelay) or nominal atrioventricular delay (120 ms). The QLV interval was defined as the time from the onset of QRS to the LV electrogram peak. CRT response was defined prospectively as a >15% reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume from implant to 6 months. RESULTS The cohort was 68% men, with a mean age of 66 +/- 11 years and LV ejection fraction of 28% +/- 8%. Longer QLV durations were significantly associated with CRT response (P < .01) for the entire cohort. Moreover, the benefit of AVO increased as QLV prolonged. At the longest QLV quartile, there was more than a 6-fold increase in the likelihood of a remodeling response compared with nominal atrioventricular delays. CONCLUSIONS Baseline electrical dyssynchrony, as measured by the QLV interval, predicted CRT response. At long QLV intervals, AVO can increase the likelihood of structural response to CRT. AVO and QLV optimized that LV lead location may work synergistically to maximize CRT response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available