4.4 Article

A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of the electrocardiographic early repolarization pattern

Journal

HEART RHYTHM
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages 1627-1634

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.06.008

Keywords

Early repolarization; Sudden cardiac death; Arrhythmia; GWAS; Meta-analysis; Electrocardiogram

Funding

  1. German Heart Foundation
  2. Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research
  3. Orion-Farmos Research Foundation
  4. Max Schaldach Fellowship in Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology
  5. National Institutes of Health [RO1HL092577, 5R21DA027021, 1RO1HL104156, 1K24HL10578]
  6. German National Genome Research Network NGFN-Plus [01GS0838]
  7. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF)/French Agence National de la Recherche (ANR) [SCD-Gene: 01KU0907]
  8. BMBF cluster of excellence personalized medicine M4
  9. National Institutes of Health
  10. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  11. Academy of Finland [129494, 139635, 134309, 126925, 121584, 124282, 129378, 117787, 41071]
  12. Affymetrix, Inc [N02-HL-6-4278]
  13. Robert Dawson Evans Endowment of the Department of Medicine at Boston University School of Medicine
  14. Boston Medical Center
  15. NHLBI Division of Intramural Research
  16. National Institute for Health and Welfare
  17. Finnish Centre for Pensions
  18. Social Insurance Institution of Finland
  19. Local Government Pensions Institution
  20. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute
  21. BMBF
  22. state of Bavaria
  23. BMBF in the context of NGFN plus [01GS0838]
  24. LMU Excellence Initiative
  25. Munich Center of Health Sciences (MC Health) as part of LMUinnovativ
  26. Social Insurance Institution of Finland, Kuopio, Tampere
  27. Turku University Hospital Medical Funds [9M048, 9N035]
  28. Juho Vainio Foundation
  29. Paavo Nurmi Foundation
  30. Finnish Foundation of Cardiovascular Research
  31. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  32. Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation
  33. Emil Aaltonen Foundation
  34. project of Genetic Park of FVG
  35. Regione FVG [L.26.2008]
  36. Associazione Amici del Cuore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND The early repolarization pattern (ERP) is common and associated with risk of sudden cardiac death. ERP is heritable, and mutations have been described in syndromatic cases. OBJECTIVE To conduct a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies to identify common genetic variants influencing ERP. METHODS We ascertained ERP on the basis of electrocardiograms in 3 large community-based cohorts from Europe and the United States: the Framingham Heart Study, the Health 2000 Study, and the KORA F4 Study. We analyzed genome-wide association studies in participants with and without ERP by logistic regression assuming an additive genetic model and meta-analyzed individual cohort results. We then sought to strengthen support for findings that reached P <= 1 x 10(-5) in independent individuals by direct genotyping or in-silico analysis of genome-wide data. We meta-analyzed the results from both stages. RESULTS Of 7482 individuals in the discovery stage, 452 showed ERP (ERP positive: mean age 46.9 +/- 8.9 years, 30.3% women; ERP negative: 47.5 +/- 9.4 years, 54.2% women). After meta-analysis, 8 single nucleotide polymorphisms reached P <= 1 x 10(-5): The most significant finding was intergenic rs11653989 (odds ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.61; P = 6.9 x 10(-9)). The most biologically relevant finding was intronic to KCND3: rs17029069 (odds ratio 1.46; 95% confidence interval 1.25-1.69; P = 8.5 x 10(-7)). In the replication step (7151 individuals), none of the 8 variants replicated, and combined meta-analysis results failed to reach genome-wide significance. CONCLUSIONS In a genome-wide association study, we were not able to reliably identify genetic variants predisposing to ERP, presumably due to insufficient statistical power and phenotype heterogeneity. The reported heritability of ERP warrants continued investigation in larger well-phenotyped populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available