4.4 Article

Differential effectiveness of pharmacological strategies to reveal dormant pulmonary vein conduction: A clinical-experimental correlation

Journal

HEART RHYTHM
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages 1426-1433

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.04.011

Keywords

Arrhythmia; ablation; adenosine; isoproterenol; atrium; electrophysiology

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 44365, MGP 6957]
  2. Fondation Leducq [ENAFRA-Network 07/CVD/03]
  3. Ministerio Espanol de Sanidad y Consumo
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  5. Fundacion para la Investigacion Biomedica del Hospital Gregorio Maranon
  6. Red RECAVA
  7. Spanish Society of Cardiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation recurs in similar to 30%-40% of patients after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) procedures, often because of restored PV-left atrial (LA) conduction. Adenosine or isoproterenol are used clinically to reveal dormant PV conduction and guide additional ablation. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the differential efficacy of adenosine and/or isoproterenol in revealing dormant PV conduction. METHODS In 25 patients undergoing PVI, dormant conduction was assessed sequentially in response to intravenous adenosine, isoproterenol, and adenosine plus isoproterenol in 100 PVs. To study mechanisms, PVs were isolated by radiofrequency ablation in coronary-perfused canine LA-PV preparations. After PVI, resting membrane potential from PV cells was recorded before and after 1 mM adenosine, 1 mu M isoproterenol, 1 mu M isoproterenol plus 1 mM adenosine, or no drug (controls). RESULTS Clinical PVI was successful in all 100 PVs, with dormant conduction in 31. Sensitivity for dormant conduction was isoproterenol 10%; adenosine 87% (P < .001 vs. isoproterenol); and isoproterenol + adenosine 100% (P = .13 vs. adenosine). Dormant PV conduction in vitro was revealed with adenosine (53%) and adenosine + isoproterenol (60%) but not with isoproterenol alone or in controls (P < .01). Radiofrequency lesions producing PVI depolarized resting membrane potential, causing inexcitability. Postablation, resting membrane potential hyperpolarized after both adenosine and isoproterenol, but adenosine-induced changes were greater (9.1 +/- 0.6 mV, vs. 3.8 +/- 0.6 mV; P < 0.001), with no significant additional effect when isoproterenol was added to adenosine. CONCLUSION Adenosine is superior to isoproterenol in revealing dormant PVs clinically and experimentally because of more effective adenosine-induced hyperpolarization. Adding isoproterenol to adenosine had no significant additional value.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available