Journal
HEART RHYTHM
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages 1749-1755Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.05.023
Keywords
Arrhythmia; Long QT syndrome; Modeling; Systems biology; Ventricular tachycardia
Categories
Funding
- National Institutes of Health [GM071558]
- American Heart Association, Heritage Affiliate [10GRNT4170020]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
BACKGROUND Repolarization reserve is frequently invoked to explain why potentially proarrhythmic drugs cause, across a population, a range of changes to cardiac action potentials (APs). However, the mechanisms underlying this interindividual variability are not understood quantitatively. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to perform a novel analysis of mathematical models of ventricular myocytes to quantify repolarization reserve and gain insight into the factors responsible for variability in the response to proarrhythmic drugs. METHODS/RESULTS In several models of human or canine ventricular myocytes, variability was simulated by randomizing model parameters and running repeated simulations. With each randomly generated set of parameters, APs before and after simulated 75% block of the rapid delayed rectifier current (I(Kr)) were calculated. Multivariable regression was performed to determine how much each model parameter attenuated or exacerbated the AP prolongation caused by the I(Kr)-blocking drug. Simulations with a human ventricular myocyte model suggest that drug response is influenced most strongly by (1) the density of I(Kr), (2) the density of slow delayed rectifier current I(Ks), (3) the voltage dependence of I(Kr) inactivation, (4) the density of L-type Ca(2+) current, and (5) the kinetics of I(Ks) activation. The analysis also identified mechanisms underlying nonintuitive behavior, such as ionic currents that prolong baseline APs but decrease drug-induced AP prolongation. Finally, the simulations provided quantitative insight into conditions that aggravate the drug response, such as silent ion channel mutations and heart failure. CONCLUSION These modeling results provide the first thorough quantification of repolarization reserve and improve our understanding of interindividual variability in adverse drug reactions.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available