Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: Implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure

BACKGROUND Defibrillation shock is known to induce atrial stunning, which is electrical and mechanical dysfunction. OBJECTIVE We hypothesized that atrial stunning is caused by higher atrial susceptibility to electroporation vs ventricles. We also hypothesize that etectroporation may be responsible for early recurrence of atrial fibrillation. METHODS We investigated electroporation induced by 10-ms epicardial high-intensity shocks applied locally in atria and ventricles of Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 12) using optical mapping. RESULTS Electroporation was centered at the electrode and was evident from transient diastolic depolarization and reduction of action potential amplitude and maximum upstroke derivative. Electroporation was voltage-dependent and polarity-dependent and was significantly more pronounced in the atria vs ventricles (P <.01), with a summary 50% of Effective Dose (ED50) for main measured parameters of 9.2 +/- 3.6 V/cm and 13.6 +/- 3.2 V/cm in the atria vs 37.4 +/- 1.5 V/cm and 48.4 +/- 2.8 V/cm in the ventricles, for anodal and cathodal stimuli, respectively. In atria (n = 5), shocks of both polarities (27.2 +/- 1.1 V/cm) transiently induced conduction block and reentry around the inexcitabte area. Electroporation-in-duced ectopic activity was a possible trigger for reentry. However, in the thicker ventricles, electroporation and resulting conduction stowing and block were restricted to the surface only, preventing complete block and arrhythmia. The upstroke morphology revealed that the wave front dived below the etectroporated region and resurfaced into unaffected epicardial tissue. CONCLUSION We showed that the atria are more vulnerable to Electroporation and resulting block and arrhythmia than the ventricles.