4.8 Article

Data for action: collection and use of local data to end tuberculosis

Journal

LANCET
Volume 386, Issue 10010, Pages 2324-2333

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00321-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [WT099854MA]
  2. South African Medical Research Council Career Development Award
  3. US National Institutes of Health [K01AI102944, R01AI112438]
  4. B Frank and Kathleen Polk Assistant Professorship in Epidemiology
  5. UK National Institute of Health Research
  6. Medical Research Council
  7. Public Health England
  8. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [SRF-2011-04-001] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  9. National Institute for Health Research [SRF-2011-04-001] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accelerating progress in the fight against tuberculosis will require a drastic shift from a strategy focused on control to one focused on elimination. Successful disease elimination campaigns are characterised by locally tailored responses that are informed by appropriate data. To develop such a response to tuberculosis, we suggest a three-step process that includes improved collection and use of existing programmatic data, collection of additional data (eg, geographic information, drug resistance, and risk factors) to inform tailored responses, and targeted collection of novel data (eg, sequencing data, targeted surveys, and contact investigations) to improve understanding of tuberculosis transmission dynamics. Development of a locally targeted response for tuberculosis will require substantial investment to reconfigure existing systems, coupled with additional empirical data to evaluate the effectiveness of specific approaches. Without adoption of an elimination strategy that uses local data to target hotspots of transmission, ambitious targets to end tuberculosis will almost certainly remain unmet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available