4.2 Article

Implementation of multiple strategies for improved door-to-balloon time in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Journal

HEART AND VESSELS
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 142-148

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-013-0336-z

Keywords

Myocardial infarction; Primary percutaneous coronary intervention; Door-to-balloon time; Computerized provider order entry; Information technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several strategies have been found to be associated with a significant reduction in door-to-balloon (D2B) time in the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to assess D2B time before and after specific hospital strategies, including a computerized provider order entry (CPOE), were implemented to reduce D2B time. Patients who presented to the emergency department within 12 h of STEMI were enrolled. Strategies adopted included: (1) electrocardiography during triage for patients with chest pain; (2) implementing a CPOE; (3) activating the catheterization laboratory by sending a cell phone notification via the computer system; (4) using an open real-time on-line STEMI registry; and (5) conducting a monthly meeting to review registration. A total of 134 patients were included in the study (preintervention, n = 69; postintervention, n = 65). Median D2B time improved from 83 to 63 min after the new strategies were implemented (P = 0.001). Median door-to-electrocardiogram (5-2 min) and door-to-laboratory time (60-41 min) also significantly improved (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with a D2B time within 90 min increased from 59.4 % to 98.5 % (P < 0.001). In conclusion, our findings suggest that implementing specific strategies can substantially improve D2B time for patients with STEMI and increase the proportion of patients with D2B time less than 90 min.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available