4.5 Article

Implementing selective digestive tract decontamination in the intensive care unit: A qualitative analysis of nurse-identified considerations

Journal

HEART & LUNG
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 13-18

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.09.002

Keywords

Antibiotic prophylaxis; Critical illness; Implementation; Selective decontamination of the digestive tract; Ventilator-associated pneumonia

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Intensive Care Foundation (Australia)
  3. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Foundation
  4. NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme (UK)
  5. National Institute for Health Research [09/01/13] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Chief Scientist Office [HSRU2] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To describe factors senior critical care nurses identify as being important, to address when introducing selective digestive tract decontamination (SDD) in the clinical setting. Background: Critically ill patients are at risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). SDD is one strategy shown to prevent VAP and possibly improve survival in the critically ill. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of qualitative data obtained from 20 interviews. An inductive thematic analysis approach was applied to data obtained from senior critical care nurses during phase two of a multi-methods study. Results: There were four primary considerations identified that should be addressed or considered prior to implementation of SDD. These considerations included education of health care professionals, patient comfort, compatibility of SDD with existing practices, and cost. Conclusions: Despite a lack of experience with, or knowledge of SDD, nurses were able to articulate factors that may influence its implementation and delivery. Organizations or researchers considering implementation of SDD should include nurses as key members of the implementation team. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available