4.5 Article

Community study to uncover the full spectrum of rheumatic heart disease in Uganda

Journal

HEART
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages 60-66

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313171

Keywords

valvular heart disease; global disease patterns

Funding

  1. Karp Family Foundation
  2. Children's National Global Health Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Estimates of the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) in many endemic countries are limited to samples of children attending schools, which generate an incomplete picture of disease burden in communities. The present study conducted household-based RHD screening in a representative community in Gulu district, Uganda. Methods Members of households identified through a two-stage cluster-sampling approach between the ages of 5 years and 50 years were invited to undergo limited cardiac testing with a handheld echocardiogram to assess for the presence of RHD. Suspicious cases underwent confirmatory echocardiogram with a fully functional machine. Results Of the 2453 community members screened, 2.45% (95% CI 1.87% to 3.14%) showed echocardiographic evidence of RHD with 1.26% (95% CI 0.860% to 1.79%) having definite RHD. The overall prevalence of RHD among participants <20 years was 2.52% (95% CI 1.78% to 3.45%), with a borderline prevalence of 1.97% (95% CI 1.33% to 2.82%) and a definite prevalence of 0.544% (95% CI 0.235% to 1.07%). Prevalence rates among youth increased with age and peaked in the age group of 16-20 years. The overall adult prevalence (>20 years) of RHD was 2.34% (95% CI 1.49% to 3.49%). The majority of definite cases were mild (81%) and marked by mitral regurgitation and associated morphological valve changes (71%). Conclusion Our data reveal a high prevalence of undiagnosed RHD within an endemic community and fill a critical gap in RHD epidemiology in African adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available