4.5 Article

Prognosis of the bradycardia pacemaker recipient assessed at first implantation: a nationwide cohort study

Journal

HEART
Volume 99, Issue 21, Pages 1573-1578

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304445

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biotronik Netherlands BV
  2. Boston Scientific BV
  3. Medtronic Netherlands BV
  4. Sorin/ELA BV
  5. St Jude Medical BV
  6. Dutch Pacemaker Registry (SPRN), Groningen
  7. Heart and Lung foundation, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Pacing technology and care have improved notably over the past decade, justifying an update on the long-term prognosis and pre-implantation determinants of prognosis of bradycardia pacemaker (PM) recipients. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting 23 Dutch pacemaker centres Patients Pre-implantation characteristics of 1517 patients receiving a first bradycardia PM between 2003-2007 were studied in relation to survival. Interventions None; patients were followed up during routine clinical practice. Main outcome measures Cause and time to death. Results At the end of a mean follow-up of 5.8 (SD 1.1) years, 512 patients (33%) died, mostly of non-cardiac cause (67%). There were two PM related deaths. Survival rates were 93%, 81%, 69%, and 61% after 1, 3, 5 and 7years, respectively. PM recipients without concomitant cardiovascular disease at implantation showed survival rates comparable to age and sex matched controls. Predictors at time of implantation associated with cardiac mortality were: age, coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes, heart failure, valve disease, and the indication for PM implantation. Predictors for all cause mortality were: male gender, age, body mass index, CAD, cardiac surgery, diabetes, heart failure, and maintained atrioventricular synchrony. Conclusions A pre-implantation history of heart failure, CAD, and diabetes are the most important predictors for worse prognosis in PM recipients. Without baseline heart disease, survival rates equal that of the general population, suggesting that the prognosis of contemporary PM recipients is mainly determined by comorbid diseases and a bradycardia pacing indication as such does not influence survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available