4.5 Article

Candesartan versus imidapril in hypertension: a randomised study to assess effects of anti-AT1 receptor autoantibodies

Journal

HEART
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages 479-484

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2009.192104

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chinese Ministry of Public Health [9707237]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30600235]
  3. foundation of the Takeda Pharmaceuticals (Tianjin, China) Co. Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Anti-angiotensin II receptor subtype 1 (AT1 receptor) autoantibodies have previously been shown in sera of hypertensive patients. This study assessed whether anti-AT1-receptor autoantibody in serum is correlated with the efficacy of an AT1-receptor blocker (ARB; candesartan)-based regimen in hypertensive patients after 8 weeks of treatment. Design The Study of Optimal Treatment in Hypertensive Patients with Anti-AT1-Receptor Autoantibodies is a multicentre, randomised, blinded endpoint, open-label, parallel-group comparison clinical trial conducted in five centres in Wuhan, China. Treatment is designed as stepwise added-on therapy to reduce blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mm Hg. 512 patients with moderate to severe primary hypertension were randomly assigned to an 8-week treatment with either ARB (candesartan)based regimen (n=257) or ACE inhibitor (imidapril)based regimen (n=255). Results Systolic and diastolic BP was reduced significantly in both treatment groups. The candesartan-based regimen achieved a significantly greater systolic BP reduction than imdapril (30.8+/-10.3 vs 28.8+/-10.3 mm Hg, p=0.023). In those anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody-positive hypertensive patients, the mean systolic BP at baseline was higher than in the anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody-negative group (160.5+/-16.5 vs 156.2+/-17.7 mm Hg; p=0.006). The mean BP reduction was greater in the candesartan-based regimen than the imidapril-based regimen (-35.4+/-9.8/16.9+/-6.9 vs -29.4+/-9.8/14.2+/-6.9 mm Hg; p=0.000 and 0.002, respectively), and more patients on imidapril required add-on medications to achieve BP control (94% vs 86%; p=0.03). No correlation was observed between the titre of anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody and the efficacy of candesartan-based therapy. In those anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody-negative patients similar BP lowering was reached in the candesartan and the imidapril-based regimens. Conclusions An ARB-based regimen is more effective in BP lowering than an ACE inhibitor-based regimen in the presence of anti-AT1 receptor autoantibodies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available