4.5 Article

Gap detection deficits in humans with tinnitus as assessed with the acoustic startle paradigm: Does tinnitus fill in the gap?

Journal

HEARING RESEARCH
Volume 295, Issue -, Pages 16-23

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.05.011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institut de la recherche en sante et securite du Travail du Quebec (IRSST)
  2. Fondation de la recherche en sante du Quebec (FRSQ)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The measurement of tinnitus in humans relies on subjective measures such as self-report, visual analog scales and questionnaires. Gap detection impairments have been tested in animals in an attempt to objectify the presence of tinnitus. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the gap startle paradigm in human participants with high-frequency tinnitus. Fifteen adults with bilateral high-frequency tinnitus but normal hearing at standard frequencies and seventeen matched controls without tinnitus were tested. The psychoacoustic characteristics of the tinnitus spectrum (pitch and loudness) were assessed using novel participant-directed custom-made methods. The startle task consisted of startle-alone, prepulse inhibition and gap-in-noise condition at low- and high-background noise frequencies. All measurements were retested after several months. Data indicate normal prepulse inhibition but higher reactivity to the startle sounds in the tinnitus group in comparison with controls. Most importantly, the tinnitus group displayed a consistent deficit in gap processing at both low- and high-background noise frequencies. All effects were identified consistently and were reproducible at retest. We propose that the higher reactivity to startle might reflect hyperacusis and that the gap deficit might be an index of abnormal cortical auditory processing in tinnitus. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available