4.5 Review

Hair cell fate decisions in cochlear development and regeneration

Journal

HEARING RESEARCH
Volume 266, Issue 1-2, Pages 18-25

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.04.012

Keywords

Cochlea; Hair cell; Supporting cell; Genetic regulation; Notch pathway; Development; Regeneration

Funding

  1. NIH/NIDCD
  2. National Organization for Hearing Research Foundation
  3. Deafness Research Foundation
  4. American Hearing Research Foundation
  5. Kramer/Dosberg Foundation
  6. Sarah Fuller Fund
  7. Patterson Trust
  8. Caroline Bass Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The discovery of avian cochlear hair cell regeneration in the late 1980s and the concurrent development of new techniques in molecular and developmental biology generated a renewed interest in understanding the genetic mechanisms that regulate hair cell development in the embryonic avian and mammalian cochlea and regeneration in the mature avian cochlea. Research from many labs has demonstrated that the development of the inner ear utilizes a complex series of genetic signals and pathways to generate the endorgans, specify cell identities, and establish innervation patterns found in the inner ear. Recent studies have shown that the Notch signaling pathway, the Atoh1/Hes signaling cascade, the stem cell marker Sox2, and some of the unconventional myosin motor proteins are utilized to regulate distinct steps in inner ear development. While many of the individual genes involved in these pathways have been identified from studies of mutant and knockout mouse cochleae, the interplay of all these signals into a single systemic program that directs this process needs to be explored. We need to know not only what genes are involved, but understand how their gene products interact with one another in a structural and temporal framework to guide hair cell and supporting cell differentiation and maturation. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available