4.5 Article

Comparison of noise-induced changes of auditory brainstem and middle latency response amplitudes in rats

Journal

HEARING RESEARCH
Volume 245, Issue 1-2, Pages 82-91

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.09.002

Keywords

Noise exposure; Long evans rats; Middle latency responses; Auditory brainstem responses; Amplitude-intensity functions

Funding

  1. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [AVOZ50390512, 309/07/1336]
  2. Internal Grant Agency of the Czech Ministry of Health [NR 8113-4]
  3. Center of Neuroscience [LC 554]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and middle latency responses (MLRs) were compared after noise exposure to elucidate the specific effects of a loud sound on the central auditory system in rats. Rats were exposed twice for I h to broad-band noise (BBN) of 118 dB SPL (first exposure) and 122 dB SPL (second exposure) with an interval between the exposures of three weeks. The first noise exposure produced threshold shifts (TSs) amounting to 5-45 dB, and the second exposure resulted in 40-70 dB TSs. The slope of MLR amplitude-intensity functions (AIFs) increased significantly in correlation with the TS, resembling loudness recruitment. However, maximal MLR amplitudes measured at 8 kHz increased after the first and second noise exposures to almost equal values in individual animals regardless of the TS. In addition, maximum MLR amplitude enhancement was dependent on pre-exposure MLR voltage, probably reflecting the level of metabolic activity or neurotransmitter processes in individual animals. In contrast to MLR amplitudes, ABR amplitudes were suppressed after noise exposure without changing the slope of ABR AIFs. The MLR changes reflect the specific effects of noise exposure on the central auditory system. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available