4.4 Article

Characterization of Adverse Events Detected in a Large Health Care Delivery System Using an Enhanced Global Trigger Tool over a Five-Year Interval

Journal

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages 1407-1425

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12163

Keywords

Adverse events; Global Trigger Tool

Funding

  1. Baylor Health Care System

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To report 5 years of adverse events (AEs) identified using an enhanced Global Trigger Tool (GTT) in a large health care system. Study Setting. Records from monthly random samples of adults admitted to eight acute care hospitals from 2007 to 2011 with lengths of stay >= 3 days were reviewed. Study Design. We examined AE incidence overall and by presence on admission, severity, stemming from care provided versus omitted, preventability, and category; and the overlap with commonly used AE-detection systems. Data Collection. Professional nurse reviewers abstracted 9,017 records using the enhanced GTT, recording triggers and AEs. Medical record/account numbers were matched to identify overlapping voluntary reports or AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs). Principal Findings. Estimated AE rates were as follows: 61.4 AEs/1,000 patient-days, 38.1 AEs/100 discharges, and 32.1 percent of patients with >= 1 AE. Of 1,300 presenton- admission AEs (37.9 percent of total), 78.5 percent showed NCC-MERP level F harm and 87.6 percent were preventable/possibly preventable. Of 2,129 hospital-acquired AEs, 63.3 percent had level E harm, 70.8 percent were preventable/possibly preventable; the most common category was surgical/procedural (40.5 percent). Voluntary reports and PSIs captured <5 percent of encounters with hospital-acquired AEs. Conclusions. AEs are common and potentially amenable to prevention. GTT-identified AEs are seldom caught by commonly used AE-detection systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available