4.4 Article

Using Quantile Regression to Examine Health Care Expenditures during the Great Recession

Journal

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 705-730

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12113

Keywords

Health care expenditures; economic recession; racial and ethnic disparities; quantile regression

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Center for Child Health and Human Development [R24-HD041041]
  2. Maryland Population Research Center
  3. MPRC Seed Grant Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To examine the association between the Great Recession of 2007-2009 and health care expenditures along the health care spending distribution, with a focus on racial/ethnic disparities. Data Sources/Study Setting Secondary data analyses of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2005-2006 and 2008-2009). Study Design Quantile multivariate regressions are employed to measure the different associations between the economic recession of 2007-2009 and health care spending. Race/ethnicity and interaction terms between race/ethnicity and a recession indicator are controlled to examine whether minorities encountered disproportionately lower health spending during the economic recession. Principal Findings The Great Recession was significantly associated with reductions in health care expenditures at the 10th-50th percentiles of the distribution, but not at the 75th-90th percentiles. Racial and ethnic disparities were more substantial at the lower end of the health expenditure distribution; however, on average the reduction in expenditures was similar for all race/ethnic groups. The Great Recession was also positively associated with spending on emergency department visits. Conclusion This study shows that the relationship between the Great Recession and health care spending varied along the health expenditure distribution. More variability was observed in the lower end of the health spending distribution compared to the higher end.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available