4.4 Article

Quality and Cost Analysis of Nurse Staffing, Discharge Preparation, and Postdischarge Utilization

Journal

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 1473-1494

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01267.x

Keywords

Hospital discharge; discharge readiness; readmission; emergency department utilization; cost

Funding

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Interdisciplinary Nursing Quality Research Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. To determine the impact of unit-level nurse staffing on quality of discharge teaching, patient perception of discharge readiness, and postdischarge readmission and emergency department (ED) visits, and cost-benefit of adjustments to unit nurse staffing. Data Sources. Patient questionnaires, electronic medical records, and administrative data for 1,892 medical-surgical patients from 16 nursing units within four acute care hospitals between January and July 2008. Design. Nested panel data with hospital and unit-level fixed effects and patient and unit-level control variables. Data Collection/Extraction. Registered nurse (RN) staffing was recorded monthly in hours-per-patient-day. Patient questionnaires were completed before discharge. Thirty-day readmission and ED use with reimbursement data were obtained by cross-hospital electronic searches. Principal Findings. Higher RN nonovertime staffing decreased odds of readmission (OR=0.56); higher RN overtime staffing increased odds of ED visit (OR=1.70). RN nonovertime staffing reduced ED visits indirectly, via a sequential path through discharge teaching quality and discharge readiness. Cost analysis projected total savings from 1 SD increase in RN nonovertime staffing and decrease in RN overtime of U.S.$11.64 million and U.S.$544,000 annually for the 16 study units. Conclusions. Postdischarge utilization costs could potentially be reduced by investment in nursing care hours to better prepare patients before hospital discharge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available