4.4 Article

Colonoscopist and Primary Care Physician Supply and Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening

Journal

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 1137-1157

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01355.x

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; cancer screening tests; health care disparities; primary care physicians; colonoscopy

Funding

  1. NIH [R01CA134275, K05CA134923, K07CA130983]
  2. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RP101207]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To determine whether racial/ethnic disparities in colonoscopy use vary by physician availability. Data Source. We used 100 percent Texas Medicare claims data for 20032007. Study Design. We identified beneficiaries aged 6679 in 2007, examined racial/ethnic differences in colonoscopy use from 2003 to 2007, and estimated the percentage of white, black, and Hispanic beneficiaries who underwent colonoscopy by level of physician availability and area income. Principal Findings. For the 974,879 beneficiaries, colonoscopy use was higher in whites (40.7 percent) compared to blacks (35.0 percent) and Hispanics (28.7 percent, p < .001). For whites, increasing availability of colonoscopists and primary care physicians (PCPs) was associated with higher colonoscopy use. For blacks and Hispanics, colonoscopy use was unchanged or decreased with increases in colonoscopist and PCP availability. In multilevel models, the odds of colonoscopy were 20 percent lower for blacks (OR 0.80, 95 percent CI 0.790.82) and 32 percent lower for Hispanics (OR 0.68, 95 percent CI 0.660.69) compared to whites; adjusting for availability of colonoscopists or PCPs did not attenuate racial/ethnic disparities. We found greater racial/ethnic disparities in areas with greater colonoscopist and PCP availability. Conclusions. Greater area availability of colonoscopists and PCPs is associated with increased use of colonoscopy in whites but decreased use in minorities, resulting in larger racial/ethnic disparities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available