4.5 Article

Socioeconomic and Psychosocial Predictors of Interleukin-6 in the MIDUS National Sample

Journal

HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 626-635

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0021360

Keywords

education; well-being; affect; inflammation

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [P01-AG020166]
  2. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Research Network
  3. General Clinical Research Centers Program [M01-RR023942, M01-RR00865]
  4. National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health [1UL1RR025011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate whether psychosocial factors (i.e., depression, anxiety, and well-being) moderated educational gradients in interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels using data from the Survey of Mid life Development in the U.S. (MIDUS). The influences of educational attainment and psychosocial factors on IL-6 in middle aged and older adults were also examined. Design: Telephone interviews and mail surveys were utilized to collect educational attainment and psychosocial information from respondents (N = 1028). Respondents also participated in an overnight clinic visit, during which health information and a fasting blood sample were obtained. Main Outcome Measures: Serum levels of IL-6. Results: Greater educational attainment predicted lower levels of IL-6 independent of age and gender, although this effect was attenuated after taking health behaviors, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and chronic illnesses into account. Psychological well-being interacted with education to predict IL-6, such that for those with less education, higher well-being was associated with lower levels of IL-6. Conclusion: The findings indicate a strong association between education and inflammation, which can be further moderated by psychosocial factors. The health benefits associated with psychological well-being were particularly evident for individuals with low educational attainment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available