4.5 Article

Is caloric restriction associated with development of eating-disorder symptoms? Results from the CALERIE trial

Journal

HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages S32-S42

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.S32

Keywords

calorie restriction; dietary restraint; eating disorders; mood disturbance; harms

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK072476] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P30DK072476] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study tested a secondary hypothesis of the CALERIE trial (Heilbronn et al., 2006) that a 12-month period of intentional dietary restriction would be associated with an increase in eating disorder symptoms. Design: To test this hypothesis, 48 overweight adults were randomly assigned to four treatment arms in a 12-month study: (1) 25% calorie restriction, (2) 12.5% calorie restriction and 12.5% increased energy expenditure by structured exercise, (3) low-calorie diet, and (4) healthy diet (no-calorie restriction). Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measures for the study were changes in: eating disorder symptoms, mood, dietary restraint, body weight, and energy balance. Results: All three dietary restriction arms were associated with increased dietary restraint and negative energy balance, but not with increased ED symptoms or other harmful psychological effects. Participants in the three calorie restriction arms lost significant amounts of body weight. The psychological and behavioral effects were maintained during a 6-month follow-up period. Conclusion: These results did not support the hypothesis that caloric restriction causes increased eating disorder symptoms in overweight adults. In general, caloric restriction had either benign or beneficial psychological and behavioral effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available