4.4 Article

Treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer: a concept mapping approach

Journal

HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 2079-2090

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12175

Keywords

cancer; concept mapping; decision making; prostate neoplasms; qualitative research

Funding

  1. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [1U48DP001 949-01, SIP 09-15]
  2. National Cancer Institute (NCI) postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Texas School of Public Health Cancer Education
  3. Career Development Program [NCI R25 CA57712]
  4. National Cancer Institute [5K01CA151785-04]
  5. ESRC [ES/H029745/1, ES/K005146/1, ES/H00811X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/H029745/1, ES/H00811X/1, ES/K005146/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Few decision aids emphasize active surveillance (AS) for localized prostate cancer. Concept mapping was used to produce a conceptual framework incorporating AS and treatment. Methods Fifty-four statements about what men need to make a decision for localized prostate cancer were derived from focus groups with African American, Latino and white men previously screened for prostate cancer and partners (n = 80). In the second phase, 89 participants sorted and rated the importance of statements. Results An eight cluster map was produced for the overall sample. Clusters were labelled Doctor-patient exchange, Big picture comparisons, Weighing the options, Seeking and using information, Spirituality and inner strength, Related to active treatment, Side-effects and Family concerns. A major division was between medical and home-based clusters. Ethnic groups and genders had similar sorting, but some variation in importance. Latinos rated Big picture comparisons as less important. African Americans saw Spirituality and inner strength most important, followed by Latinos, then whites. Ethnic-and gender-specific concept maps were not analysed because of high similarity in their sorting patterns. Conclusions We identified a conceptual framework for management of early-stage prostate cancer that included coverage of AS. Eliciting the conceptual framework is an important step in constructing decision aids which will address gaps related to AS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available