Journal
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 419-429Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12047
Keywords
expanded newborn screening; mixed methods; public engagement; public expectations
Categories
Funding
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (HGE) [89020]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
ObjectivesNewborn bloodspot screening (NBS) panels have expanded to include conditions for which treatment effects are less certain, creating debate about population-based screening criteria. We investigated Canadian public expectations and values regarding the types of conditions that should be included in NBS and whether parents should provide consent. MethodsEight focus groups (FG; n=60) included education, deliberative discussion and pre-/post-questionnaires. Data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. ResultsQuantitatively, the majority supported NBS for serious disorders for which treatment is not available (95-98, 82%). A majority endorsed screening without explicit consent (77-88%) for treatable disorders, but 62% supported unpressured choice for screening for untreatable disorders. Qualitatively, participants valued treatment-related benefits for infants and informational benefits for families. Concern for anxiety, stigma and unwanted knowledge depended upon disease context and strength of countervailing benefits. ConclusionsAnticipated benefits of expanded infant screening were prioritized over harms, with information provision perceived as a mechanism for mitigating harms and enabling choice. However, we urge caution around the potential for public enthusiasm to foster unlimited uptake of infant screening technologies.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available