4.4 Article

Development and evaluation of a decision aid for patients considering first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

Journal

HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 35-45

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00470.x

Keywords

chemotherapy; decision aid; metastatic breast cancer; shared decision-making

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Treatment decisions in advanced breast cancer are complex, with enhanced quality of life and survival among important treatment goals. Patients with metastatic breast cancer face the decision of whether or not to have chemotherapy, and many wish to be involved in this decision. We report the development and evaluation of a decision aid (DA) designed to assist patients facing this treatment decision. Design and sample Women with metastatic breast cancer (n=17) and medical oncologists in Australia and Canada (n=7) were invited to evaluate the DA. Intervention A DA was developed for patients with hormone-resistant metastatic breast cancer considering chemotherapy. The DA presented options of supportive care, with or without chemotherapy. Potential benefits and side effects of different chemotherapy regimens, and evidence-based prognostic estimates were described, and a values clarification exercise included. Main outcome measures Patient questionnaires evaluating information and decision involvement preferences, attitudes toward the DA and oncologist feedback regarding attitudes toward the DA. Results Seventeen patients participated; fifteen desired as much information about their illness as possible; sixteen wished to be actively involved in the decision-making process. The majority rated the DA as highly acceptable, clear and informative, and would recommend it to others facing this treatment decision. Conclusion This is the first DA for patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer considering chemotherapy. A randomized trial is underway to evaluate its role in clinical decision-making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available