4.3 Article

Comparing costs and outcomes across programmes of health care

Journal

HEALTH ECONOMICS
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 316-337

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/hec.1716

Keywords

allocative efficiency; budget elasticities; programme budgets; local health authorities; health outcomes

Funding

  1. Health Foundation under its Quest for Quality and Improved Performance (QQuIP) initiative
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-060-25-0045]
  3. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G020841/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. ESRC [ES/G020841/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the expenditure choices of local health authorities operating under fixed budget constraints. It applies a theoretical model of budgeting to a data set from 303 English Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) across ten broad programmes of health care to derive estimates of the elasticity of expenditure in each programme with respect to the total income of the PCT. The results suggest quite similar income elasticities across most programmes, in the range 0.6441.128. The only outlier is the musculoskeletal programme with an elasticity of about 0.46. The modelling also derives estimates of spending elasticities with respect to medical needs and thereby permits calculation of the implicit cost of saving a life year in five programmes of care. The results are important as they indicate to policy makers how specific programme areas might be affected by general budgetary reductions. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available