Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity
Denzil G. Fiebig et al.
MARKETING SCIENCE (2010)
RATIONALISING THE 'IRRATIONAL': A THINK ALOUD STUDY OF DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT RESPONSES
Mandy Ryan et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2009)
USING DCE AND RANKING DATA TO ESTIMATE CARDINAL VALUES FOR HEALTH STATES FOR DERIVING A PREFERENCE-BASED SINGLE INDEX FROM THE SEXUAL QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE
Julie Ratcliffe et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2009)
COMPARING WELFARE ESTIMATES FROM PAYMENT CARD CONTINGENT VALUATION AND DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS
Mandy Ryan et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2009)
Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods
Christopher M. Fleming et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (2009)
Efficient stated choice experiments for estimating nested logit models
Michiel C. J. Bliemer et al.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL (2009)
Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods
Soren Boye Olsen
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2009)
Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future
Jordan J. Louviere et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW (2009)
Emotions and decision rules in discrete choice experiments for valuing health care programmes for the elderly
Jorge E. Arana et al.
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS (2008)
Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform Healthcare decision making
Emily Lancsar et al.
PHARMACOECONOMICS (2008)
Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives
John M. Rose et al.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL (2008)
Designing discrete choice experiments: Do optimal designs come at a price?
Jordan J. Louviere et al.
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH (2008)
Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments:: A Monte Carlo study
Silvia Ferrini et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (2007)
Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments
Emily Lancsar et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2007)
Best-worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it
Terry N. Flynn et al.
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS (2007)
Validity of discrete-choice experiments evidence for health risk reduction
Harry Telser et al.
APPLIED ECONOMICS (2007)
Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?
Emily Lancsar et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2006)
A comparison of criteria to design efficient choice experiments
Roselinde Kessels et al.
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH (2006)
Using discrete choice experiments within a cost-benefit analysis framework - Some considerations
Emma McIntosh
PHARMACOECONOMICS (2006)
Why worry about awareness in choice problems? Econometric analysis of screening for cervical cancer
R Belkar et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2006)
Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments
DJ Street et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING (2005)
Optimal designs for choice experiments with asymmetric attributes
L Burgess et al.
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE (2005)
'Threats' to and hopes for estimating benefits
M Ryan et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2005)
Heterogeneous conjoint choice designs
Z Sándor et al.
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH (2005)
Empirical investigation of experimental design properties of discrete choice experiments in health care
R Viney et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2005)
'Irrational' stated preferences: a quantitative and qualitative investigation
F San Miguel et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2005)
Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1)
M Ryan
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2004)
Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory
E Lancsar et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2004)
Using stated preference and revealed preference modeling to evaluate prescribing decisions
TL Mark et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2004)
Optimal and near-optimal pairs for the estimation of effects in 2-level choice experiments
DJ Street et al.
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE (2004)
Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks
JL Lusk et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2004)
Conjoint analysis. The cost variable: an Achilles' heel?
US Skjoldborg et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2003)
Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics
N Hanley et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2003)
Optimal designs for 2(k) choice experiments
L Burgess et al.
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS (2003)
Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models
Z Sándor et al.
MARKETING SCIENCE (2002)
Dissecting the random component of utility
J Louviere et al.
MARKETING LETTERS (2002)
Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: The effects of complexity on choice consistency
JR DeShazo et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (2002)
Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers' prior beliefs
Z Sándor et al.
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH (2001)
Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment
F Carlsson et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (2001)
Testing for consistency in willingness to pay experiments
M Ryan et al.
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY (2000)
Share Paper
