4.4 Article

Mapping the EQ-5D index by UPDRS and PDQ-8 in patients with Parkinson's disease

Journal

HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-35

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; Quality of life; EuroQoL/EQ-5D; UPDRS; PDQ-8; Prediction

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research/Parkinson Competence Network [01GI9901/1]
  2. German Parkinson Association
  3. COMET Center ONCOTYROL
  4. Austrian Federal Ministries BMVIT/BMWFJ (via FFG)
  5. Tiroler Zukunftsstiftung/Standortagentur Tirol (SAT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Clinical studies employ the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) to measure the severity of Parkinson's disease. Evaluations often fail to consider the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) or apply disease-specific instruments. Health-economic studies normally use estimates of utilities to calculate quality-adjusted life years. We aimed to develop an estimation algorithm for EuroQol- 5 dimensions (EQ-5D)-based utilities from the clinical UPDRS or disease-specific HrQoL data in the absence of original utilities estimates. Methods: Linear and fractional polynomial regression analyses were performed with data from a study of Parkinson's disease patients (n=138) to predict the EQ-5D index values from UPDRS and Parkinson's disease questionnaire eight dimensions (PDQ-8) data. German and European weights were used to calculate the EQ-5D index. The models were compared by R-2, the root mean square error (RMS), the Bayesian information criterion, and Pregibon's link test. Three independent data sets validated the models. Results: The regression analyses resulted in a single best prediction model (R-2: 0.713 and 0.684, RMS: 0.139 and 13.78 for indices with German and European weights, respectively) consisting of UPDRS subscores II, III, IVa-c as predictors. When the PDQ-8 items were utilised as independent variables, the model resulted in an R-2 of 0.60 and 0.67. The independent data confirmed the prediction models. Conclusion: The best results were obtained from a model consisting of UPDRS subscores II, III, IVa-c. Although a good model fit was observed, primary EQ-5D data are always preferable. Further validation of the prediction algorithm within large, independent studies is necessary prior to its generalised use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available