4.5 Article

Making The 'Pay' Matter In Pay-For-Performance: Implications For Payment Strategies

Journal

HEALTH AFFAIRS
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 1498-1508

Publisher

PROJECT HOPE
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1498

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development Career Development Award
  2. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  3. Pennsylvania Department of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although pay-for-performance (P4P) is being widely adopted, little is known about how different P4P strategies affect provider payment. These differences may be essential in motivating and maximizing quality improvement across all providers. We review hospitals' P4P strategies and describe differences in payments by size of reward; payment differences between high- and low-performing providers; ability to reward improvement in the absence of high performance; and the percentage of payments based on performance. Bonuses vary considerably by payment strategy, which suggests that the strategy selected should vary depending on program goals. These findings are relevant to P4P for any type of provider. [Health Aff (Millwood). 2009; 28(5):1498-508; 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1498]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available