4.5 Article

MARKETWATCH Choosing The Best Hospital: The Limitations Of Public Quality Reporting

Journal

HEALTH AFFAIRS
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 1680-1687

Publisher

PROJECT HOPE
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1680

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Doris Duke Clinical Scientist Development Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The call for accountability in health care quality has fueled the development of consumer-oriented Web sites that provide hospital ratings. Taking the consumer perspective, we compared five Web sites to assess the level of agreement in their rankings of local hospitals for four diagnoses. The sites assessed different measures of structure, process, and outcomes and did not use consistent patient definitions or reporting periods. Consequently, they failed to agree on hospital rankings within any diagnosis, even when using the same metric (such as mortality). In their current state, rating services appear likely to confuse, rather than inform, consumers. [Health Affairs 27, no. 6 (2008): 1680-1687; 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1680]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available