4.5 Article

Preventive Medication Adherence in African American and Caucasian Headache Patients

Journal

HEADACHE
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages 520-532

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01866.x

Keywords

headache; medication adherence; race-related health disparities

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [K01 NS046582]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Objectives. To examine race-related differences in adherence to preventive medication agents in headache patients and identify factors predictive of medication adherence in Caucasian and African American headache patients. Methods. Using a longitudinal naturalistic study design, data from 77 Caucasian and 32 African American headache patients were collected through (1) 30-day daily diaries that assessed medication adherence, headache frequency, and headache episode severity; (2) self-administered surveys that assessed headache management self-efficacy; and (3) telephone-administered psychiatric interviews that yielded psychiatric diagnoses. Using daily diary adherence data, patients' adherence to preventive agents was dichotomized as Inconsistent (ie, adhered fewer than 80% of days) or Consistent (ie, adhered >= 80% of days during the past month). Results. The proportion of adherent African American patients (69%) did not differ significantly from the proportion of adherent Caucasian patients (82%). Exploratory univariate logistic regression analyses found that preventive medication adherence levels of 80% or less were associated with being diagnosed with major depressive disorder and lower levels of headache management self-efficacy. Conclusions. Future research should test if interventions that reduce depressive symptoms and increase patients' levels of headache management self-efficacy can produce concomitant increases in adherence to preventive headache agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available