Journal
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 840-845Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hed.21823
Keywords
observer variation; head and neck cancer; extranodal tumor spread; histopathology; lymph nodes
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background Extranodal spread (ENS) of tumors is widely used as a prognosticator for patients with head and neck cancer and is used as an indicator for postoperative treatment. However, the histopathologic agreement among pathologists on the assessment of the presence or absence of this criterion has never been studied. Methods The interobserver and intraobserver agreement among 10 pathologists on the diagnosis of ENS in 41 tumor-positive lymph nodes was evaluated. Results The kappa value of the interobserver agreement among pathologists varied between 0.14 and 0.75, the overall kappa value was 0.42 and 0.49 in the 2 scoring sessions. The intraobserver kappa value varied between 0.49 and 0.95. Conclusion The intraobserver and interobserver agreement among pathologists in the assessment of the presence of ENS was low in metastatic lymph nodes in the neck. Because of the widely accepted prognostic significance and therapeutic consequences of ENS, there is a need for internationally accepted reproducible criterion for the histopathologic assessment of ENS in metastatic lymph nodes in the neck. (c) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2011
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available