4.4 Article

Effects of membrane characteristics on performances of pressure retarded osmosis power system

Journal

KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages 1249-1257

Publisher

KOREAN INSTITUTE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-014-0354-2

Keywords

Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO); Water Permeability Coefficient; Solute Permeability Coefficient; Membrane Resistivity; Water Flux; Power Density

Funding

  1. New & Renewable Energy Technology Development Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy [20103020070060]
  2. Hongik University Research Fund
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20103020070060] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Effects of the characteristics of membrane such as water permeability-coefficient, solute permeability-coefficient, and membrane resistivity on the performances of the spiral wound module in the PRO system have been studied numerically. Fluxes of water and solute through membrane, and concentrations and flow rates in the channels were obtained. The water flux through membrane increases almost linearly with the water permeability-coefficient, but it is insensitive to the solute permeability-coefficient. Decreasing the membrane resistivity makes the water flux through membrane and the power density increase. Effects of the membrane resistivity on the water flux through membrane and flow rates in the channels are small when the difference between the inlet-pressures of draw- and feed-channel is large and vice versa. The power density increases and then decreases as the channel-inlet pressure difference increases. The maximum power density is 16 W/m(2) at 14 atm of the channel-inlet pressure difference in our system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available