4.6 Article

Modified local sands for the mitigation of harmful algal blooms

Journal

HARMFUL ALGAE
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 381-387

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2011.01.003

Keywords

Chitosan; Harmful algal bloom; Modified sands; Polyaluminum chloride (PAC); Seawater; Synergistic effect

Funding

  1. National Key Project for Basic Research [2008CB418105, 2010CB933600]
  2. NOAA [NA06NOS4780245]
  3. NSF [OCE-0430724, DMS-0417769]
  4. NIEHS [1P50-ES01274201]
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [0911031] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new method was developed for marine harmful algal bloom (HAB) mitigation using local beach sand or silica sand modified with chitosan and polyaluminum chloride (PAC). Untreated sand was ineffective in flocculating algal cells, but 80% removal efficiency was achieved for Amphidinium carterae Hulburt and Chlorella sp. in 3 min (t(80) = 3 min) using 120 mg L-1 sand modified with 10 mg L-1 PAC and 10 mg L-1 chitosan. After several hours 92-96% removal was achieved. The t(80) for removing A. carterae using the modifiers only (PAC and chitosan combined) was 60 min and for Chlorella sp. 120 min, which are much slower than with the corresponding modified sand. Sands were critical for speeding up the kinetic processes of flocculation and sedimentation of algal flocs. PAC was helpful in forming small flocs and chitosan is essential to bridge the small flocs into large dense flocs. Chitosan was also important in inhibiting the escape of cells from the flocs. Chitosan and PAC used together as modifiers make it possible to use local beach sands for HAB mitigation in seawater. Economical and environmental concerns could be reduced through the use of sands and biodegradable chitosan, but the potential impacts of PAC need further study. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available