4.6 Article

Morphology, toxin composition and molecular analysis of Dinophysis ovum Schutt, a dinoflagellate of the Dinophysis acuminata complex

Journal

HARMFUL ALGAE
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 839-848

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2008.04.006

Keywords

Dinophysis acuminata; Dinophysis ovum; DSP toxins; PCR; ITS rDNA; Cytochrome c

Funding

  1. DINOPHYSIS Galicia
  2. DINOGENES
  3. PHYCODISIS [CTM2004-04078-C03]
  4. Fundacion Areces
  5. MAE-AECI
  6. Chilean CEQUA-IFOP
  7. Spanish MEC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work provides a morphological, toxinological and molecular description of Dinophysis ovum Schutt, a species included in the Dinophysis acuminata complex, and often misidentified as D. acuminata Claparede and Lachmann. A dinoflagellate bloom occurred in the Galician Rias Baixas (NW Spain) in June 2006, where D. ovum was the overwhelmingly dominant (97%) Dinophysis species, accompanied by small numbers of D. acuminata, and other Dinophysis spp., Protoperidinium spp. and Ceratium spp. D. ovum was discriminated from D. acuminata at the light microscope on the basis of their different cell contours; it had only okadaic acid (OA) (7.1 pg cell(-1)) as a detectable lipophilic toxin component. Molecular analyses of the ITS1-5,8S-ITS2 rDNA region showed that D. ovum was grouped in a common clade of small-sized species of Dinophysis, close to D. sacculus. Analyses of mitochondrial genes (Cytochrome c oxydase 1) of D. ovum and D. acuminata showed this region exhibited a much higher variability -25 bp difference between the 2 species under study and was therefore more appropriate than rDNA genes for phylogenetic analyses of Dinophysis spp. This is the first report of lipophilic shellfish toxins in D. ovum, and of analyses of mitochondrial genes to discriminate between different species of Dinophysis. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available