4.3 Article

Phamacokinetics of rivaroxaban in adolescents

Journal

HAMOSTASEOLOGIE
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 85-87

Publisher

SCHATTAUER GMBH-VERLAG MEDIZIN NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN
DOI: 10.5482/HAMO-13-06-0033

Keywords

Rivaroxaban; pharmacokinetics; adolescents

Categories

Funding

  1. Bayer Healthcare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban is approved for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment in adults. However, in all phase-Ill trials children or adolescents have not been included. For underaged VIE patients, current standard treatment consists of low molecular weight heparin or Vitamin K antagonists. Rivaroxaban could be an attractive alternative, however, no data on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of rivaroxaban in adolescents are currently available. Patient, methods: We report PK data for rivaroxaban derived from a girl (age:15 years), who presented three month after acute deep vein thrombosis, already receiving rivaroxaban therapy. In the steady state of rivaroxaban therapy (20 mg once daily), plasma levels at baseline, 3 and 6 hours after intake of rivaroxaban were measured to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and changes of global coagulation tests. Results: At baseline, a very low trough level of only 9.9 ng/ml rivaroxaban was found. At 3 hours, a peak concentration of 137.76 ng/ml rivaroxaban was observed with a rapid decrease within 6 hours after drug intake, when plasma levels of 34.45 ng/ml were measured. The patients INR and aPTT values reacted correspondingly. Conclusion: Our data indicate that adolescents may exhibit lower peak and trough levels after rivaroxaban intake compared to adult patients, but seem to have similar PK curves during the elimination phase. While our case is the first published case of a successful VIE treatment in an under-aged, we strongly discourage the routine use of rivaroxaban in non-adult patients, until data from phase II and III trials are available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available