4.7 Article

Robust support vector data description for outlier detection with noise or uncertain data

Journal

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 129-137

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.09.025

Keywords

Outlier detection; Support vector data description; Local density; epsilon-insensitive loss

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61072087, 61371193]
  2. Characteristic Discipline Fund of Shanxi Province, China [80010302010053]
  3. Major Science and Technology Program of Shanxi Province, China [20121101004]
  4. Key Technologies R & D Program of Shanxi Province, China [20130321004-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As an example of one-class classification methods, support vector data description (SVDD) offers an opportunity to improve the performance of outlier detection and reduce the loss caused by outlier occurrence in many real-world applications. However, due to limited outliers, the SVDD model is built only by using the normal data. In this situation, SVDD may easily lead to over fitting when the normal data contain noise or uncertainty. This paper presents two types of new SVDD methods, named R-SVDD and epsilon NR-SVDD, which are constructed by introducing cutoff distance-based local density of each data sample and the epsilon-insensitive loss function with negative samples. We have demonstrated that the proposed methods can improve the robustness of SVDD for data with noise or uncertainty by extensive experiments on ten UCI datasets. The experimental results have shown that the proposed epsilon NR-SVDD is superior to other existing outlier detection methods in terms of the detection rate and the false alarm rate. Meanwhile, the proposed R-SVDD can also achieve a better outlier detection performance with only normal data. Finally, the proposed methods are successfully used to detect the image-based conveyor belt fault. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available