4.7 Article

A new method for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations

Journal

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Volume 73, Issue -, Pages 111-123

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.09.011

Keywords

Group decision making; Analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy preference relation; Additive consistency; Goal programming model

Funding

  1. Funds for Creative Research Groups of China [71221061]
  2. Projects of Major International Cooperation NSFC [71210003]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71201089, 71201110, 27127117, 71271029]
  4. Natural Science Foundation Youth Project of Shandong Province, China [ZR2012GQ005]
  5. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20111101110036]
  6. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China [NCET-12-0541]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a new method to coping with group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference information. To do this, it first defines an additively consistent index of fuzzy preference relations, and then gives a method to calculating the priority vector for additively consistent fuzzy preference relations. When the individual fuzzy preference relation is incomplete, a goal programming model is constructed, by which the missing values can be obtained. Then, an iterative approach to obtain the acceptably additive consistency of fuzzy preference relations is introduced. After that, an induced hybrid weighted aggregation (IHWA) operator is presented to aggregate the collective fuzzy preference relation. The main features of this aggregation operator are that the group consistency is no smaller than the highest individual inconsistency, and the group consensus is no smaller than the smallest consensus between the individual fuzzy preference relations. As a series of development, an algorithm based on the acceptable consistency and the group consensus is developed. Finally, three examples are given to show the efficiency and feasibility of the developed procedure, and comparisons are also offered. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available