wyy 2023-06-12

Please provide an editing code, the younger generation is eager to learn.

wyy 2023-06-12

Brother, how did your submission turn out?

wyy 2023-06-12

Dear Editor-in-Chief, hello!

wyy 2023-06-12

Hello author, what was the system status during the minor revision? Did it mention reconsidering your manuscript after the minor revision? Will the minor revisions be sent for external review?

荔枝台 2023-04-19

I just found out too, and I am shocked. I suggest starting with the top of the second zone for now, as directly operating in the first zone might be too obvious.

荔枝台 2023-04-19

I also discovered two characteristics. One is that the number of articles published in the past year has increased by almost double, and the other is that the self-citation rate has rapidly declined. Please note, it is a rapid decline. There are experts in this field.

荔枝台 2023-04-19

A very remarkable journal. It has never been in Tier 1 before, and even the upgraded basic version last year wasn't in the top. In just one year, it directly became Tier 1 TOP. I wonder what has happened in the past year... Also, I would like to know if there are many Chinese authors publishing in this journal and whether the Editor-in-Chief and Deputy Editor-in-Chief are Chinese.

daolaimi 2023-03-30

A highly recognized journal in the industry, with responsible editors and reviewers, strict review procedures, professional questions, and the addition of experiments and data. It took 5 months with a major revision and a minor revision. It was upgraded to a top-tier journal (Zone 1) last year, and we hope it will continue to improve in the future.

Suih456 2023-02-24

Brothers, this journal is definitely not worth submitting to. I submitted my article in July 2022 and received feedback from two reviewers in October 2022. The editor requested major revisions. After seriously revising for over a month (because I had to conduct additional experiments, so I requested an extension), I submitted the revised version. Surprisingly, instead of sending it back to the original reviewers, the second round of review was assigned to two new reviewers! These new reviewers provided more comments on the manuscript (received in January 2023) and the editor requested major revisions once again. After diligently revising again, I submitted it. This time, however, the editor did not send it for review and instead desk rejected it, along with a long paragraph of comments pointing out the problems in the paper and suggesting submitting elsewhere.

I'm really frustrated. The editor's comments were actually present in the original version, but the editor didn't mention them at first. They waited until after two rounds of major revisions to mention them and then directly rejected the paper! If the editor wanted to reject it or had any concerns, why didn't they reject it earlier? I can only describe this journal and editor as infuriating, completely wasting people's precious time! I'm not a sensitive person, it's normal for articles to be rejected, but I strongly advise everyone to be cautious about submitting to this journal - you never know when a desk reject will arrive.

Alright, brothers, I'm really angry. I'm going to leave a review on other journal platforms as well. I need to vent this frustration!

Woolf 2023-01-27

The update time for "under review" has been changed to January 24th.

rabbit87 2023-01-18

AR has become the top district?

Woolf 2023-01-17

1.17日 Under Review

Translation: "January 17th Under Review"

伍孚 2023-01-13

The manuscript was submitted on January 7th and is currently in the submission status. We will update it with the follow-up results.

02100 2022-11-14

2022.11.14 Early morning submission
2022.11.14 Afternoon with editor

LeeXD 2022-10-23

Update: 2022.10.21 Two reviewers have confirmed the review.

wangyize 2022-10-19

No reasons were given, just said that after careful consideration, three other journals were recommended.

LeeXD 2022-10-16

2022.10.03 submit
2022.10.11 with editor
2022.10.16 under review

My senior brother said that as long as this journal is done decently, it can be published. He praised mine as "above average," but I don't know if it's just flattery. The topic of the article I submitted is as common as can be in AR research (there are so many similar ones, maybe it's just relatively ordinary?). Let's wait for the result and see.

hjr 2022-07-04

2022-2-9 Submission
2022-3-25 Feedback for major revision
2022-4-19 Revised draft submitted
2022-5-17 Feedback for minor and major revisions
2022-6-15 Revised draft submitted
2022-7-1 Accepted

movee 2022-05-27

Brother, how long ago did you last meet with the editor?

zermi 2022-04-08

Is it still submitting after more than a week? Are there any brothers who are the same? How long have you all been editors for?

Estella 2022-02-20

2021-9-16 Submission
2021-12-17 Review received Major revision
2022-1-17 Revised manuscript submitted
2022-2-15 Review received Minor revision
2022-2-18 Revised manuscript submitted
2022-2-20 Accepted

路灯の闪闪 2021-08-30

Posted on May 18, 2021
Received on August 26, 2021
After two minor revisions, the first revision was actually more like a major revision. Some experiments were added and after the revision, one of the reviewers directly agreed to accept it. The second revision was still minor, and after 3 days of modification, it was returned and accepted by the editor on the third day.
The reviewers were quite professional and asked detailed questions. The overall speed of the editorial process was fast. The requirements for innovation and language were satisfactory. It is my first paper in life, and I will continue to submit in the future if I have the opportunity.

asistent 2021-06-02

2021-5-26 Submission
2021-6-2 with editor
The previous submission on overall environment and environmental management was rejected before it was sent to the editor. Will the same thing happen again this time?

LLP 2021-04-28

This journal requires high levels of innovation. The previous submission required major revisions which took approximately six months before it was finally published successfully. It is a very good magazine in the field of atmospheric sciences.

tianyeouc 2021-03-25

The screenwriter refused to accept the rejection for about a week, sobbing.

tianyeouc 2021-03-05

Slow, it's been three days and there's still no with editor.

nanjing2020hu 2021-01-22

Has there been any news about the main manuscript?