Int_Crazy 2021-08-21

The academic editor's comments will be provided after receiving all the reviewers' feedback. However, in some cases, the editor may provide comments before the under review stage.

致富大仙 2021-08-19

After the reviewer's comments come back, you can directly click in to see them. On August 19th, the 5th reviewer's comments came back: 1 yes, 4 can. The decision is still pending. I hope there won't be any more reviewers... Disgusted.

SP_CS_Han 2021-08-18

Hello, where can I see the reviewer comments, such as the ones you shared on 8.6 and 8.13?

wyuan1 2021-08-18

Fish for yourself.

致富大仙 2021-08-17

On July 19th, the submission was put under review.
On August 6th, feedback from three reviewers came back. Two were positive (3 yes, 2 can / 3 yes, 2 can) and one was negative (1 yes, 2 can, 2 must).
On August 6th, a request was made for an additional reviewer.
On August 13th, feedback from the fourth reviewer came back with five yes.
Pending decision until August 16th.

henrycheng 2021-08-17

I want to ask, if this journal has an annual increase of 1000 submissions, is it possible for it to be on the Chinese Academy of Sciences' warning list in a few years?

wail 2021-08-16

Excuse me, has the result come out now?

SP_CS_Han 2021-08-16

Your manuscript has been assigned to Andrei-Cosmin Diaconu for further processing. Is this person an academic editor? It has been 40 days since the initial review and there has been no response to emails.

wyuan1 2021-08-15

Excuse me, are the review comments from academic editors not displayed in the same system/module as the regular review comments? In other words, how can we distinguish which ones are from academic editors?

wyuan1 2021-08-15

Can I start preparing my response as soon as I receive the reviewer's comments? It's been two weeks since the pending decision, and I have almost finished writing my response to the comments... But it's still pending.

wyuan1 2021-08-15

Can I ask if the three review comments include the opinion of the "academic editor"?
I have already seen two review comments in my system.
Currently, it has been two weeks since the pending revision, has it been sent to the academic editor for further review again?

幽灵零贰 2021-08-14

July submission 18 days First round of review completed Two agreed, one major revision Editor provided major revision Return in early August Second round of review all agreed one week later Accepted 3 days later

Int_Crazy 2021-08-12

No opinions on the manuscript means there are none.

Jackshen127 2021-08-11

May I ask, after the second review, is it possible that one of the reviewers' comments cannot be seen? Is there such a situation?

Int_Crazy 2021-08-11

Received Date: July 15, 2021
Major Revision: July 29, 2021
Minor Revision: August 9, 2021
Accepted Date: August 10, 2021

There were a total of 3 reviewers. During the major revision, two reviewers suggested minor revisions while one suggested major revisions. One of the reviewers requested the addition of a comparative experiment, a model comparison experiment, and an efficiency comparison experiment. It was challenging to make the changes, but we still carefully added them, resulting in an improvement in the quality of the paper.

LONG_RTG 2021-08-10

The expert reviewers recommended acceptance, but the editor rejected it claiming that it did not meet the requirements of the journal. I am speechless.

Cethy 2021-08-10

What does "English review of receiving emails" refer to? Is it a mandatory process? Are there no opinions on receiving or minor revisions? Can the system also show the opinions of the second review?

一只小朱 2021-08-07

7.12 First submission
7.26 Received first round of revisions, with one major revision and one minor revision suggested by the reviewers. The final decision was to make the major revision, with a deadline of ten days given.
8.1 Submitted revised manuscript after completing major revisions.
8.5 Received email of acceptance.
8.6 Made payment.
8.7 The manuscript can now be viewed on the official website, but only in the form of image summaries. Keyword searches are not possible, and it can only be accessed through the specified website.

Overall, the process was quite fast, and the reviewers' comments were not difficult to address. The revisions required were significant, but it was not as troublesome as expected. Generally, the process went smoothly.

The only headache I have now is that they only provided a payment receipt and I have not received the invoice yet. I am currently emailing the payment department to request the invoice. It's quite challenging for me.

SP_CS_Han 2021-08-07

It has been a month and the review has not come back yet. Previously, it would come back in less than a month, but now it's getting slower and slower...

Kelly250230225 2021-08-04

After reading everyone's sharing, I will share my submission process.
Submitted on July 7, 2021, it was pending review and then changed to under review on the same day.
On July 28, the status changed to pending decision, and it continued for several days, coinciding with a weekend and a few days after a business trip.
On August 4, it was rejected.
According to the email, it suggests making modifications and resubmitting.
Good luck to everyone!

wyuan1 2021-08-04

May I ask, how long did it take to make the changes in this stage after the academic editor provided a few suggestions and finally confirmed it as a minor revision? The latest review comment I received was replied to on July 31st, and it is still pending decision now...

wyuan1 2021-08-04

Congratulations in advance, OP! Additionally, may I ask: 1) To what extent are the opinions returned in the first review before an editor provides minor revisions? 2) How long did it take for a pending decision after receiving opinions from the first review?

wyuan1 2021-08-02

June 10th submission
June 11th Under review
August 1st Pending decision
... (To be continued)

The most recent comment came back on July 31st, and only 7 suggestions were given.
Reviewer#1: 3 Yes, 2 Can; Reviewer#2: 2 Yes, 3 Can.
It feels like even if given the opportunity, major revisions would be requested.

青山依旧2021 2021-07-28

Posted on July 1st, minor revision on July 22nd, revised and submitted after minor revision on July 27th, accepted on July 28th. Overall, this journal has a higher requirement for English. I submitted after proofreading, and all three reviewers provided positive feedback on the English, suggesting to proofread before submission.

Kelly250230225 2021-07-26

Is there any news?

大红中 2021-07-23

Dear seniors, I would like to ask if the topic of remote sensing does not have a suitable option for submission. I chose environmental remote sensing from the sections. Is this the main publication? I appreciate your help.

Kelly250230225 2021-07-22

I submitted the special issue in RS, it seems like the system assigned it to me directly, but it has been half a month now and there is no response.

wyuan1 2021-07-22

I dare not ask, I dare not urge, and my supervisor also suggests waiting and seeing. Will there be an email notification if the editor is changed (similar to editor assignment)? I feel that there is a high probability that the reviewer has been changed or someone has withdrawn midway through the review process, since we need to gather three reviewer comments. By the way, I also don't know how to check if the reviewer's comments have been returned.

wyuan1 2021-07-22

The first review has been waiting for 41 days.

Kelly250230225 2021-07-22

Thank you, the host, for the encouragement. I had submitted a contribution but it got rejected, and now I'm afraid of being rejected again. Whenever I submit something now, it always feels like a tragedy. Haha.