Lara Li 2022-02-15

1.18 submitted turned into under review on the same day.
2.8 pending decision. Three reviewers' responses can be seen in the system, all of which are positive.
2.11 pending minor revision. Given 5 days, replied carefully and addressed each point for modification.
2.14 resubmit.
2.14 revised version received.
2.14 pending editor decision.
2.15 paper accepted.

Overall, the experience was very good. The editor was diligent and responsible, providing prompt feedback. The reviewers' comments were also professional and helped improve the content of the article.
Wishing the journal continued success!

把温暖藏进心里 2022-02-14

2021.04.28 Post
2021.06.09 Minor revision
2021.06.12 Accepted after revision
2021.06.18 Online
2021.07.05 Can be found on Web of Science

等结果ing 2022-02-09

Personal first research paper, from the first work during the master's period. I am very grateful to Remote Sensing for accepting it. Over the past two years, I have also reviewed many papers on RS and overall, I feel that the editorial process is not strict enough, resulting in many poor-quality papers being sent for review. On the other hand, the reviewers are generally very tolerant. As a result, RS itself has many excellent achievements, but its reputation is seriously affected by some bad articles.

As a researcher, we should still support open-access journals. I hope that the editorial department can strictly review in the future and not let the reputation of RS disappoint many good research published in it.

黎156 2022-02-05

The review speed is very fast, and the comments are very pertinent, making it a preferred choice for resubmission after rejection in a top-tier journal;
Foreign currency remittance of 2400 Swiss Francs and subsequent reimbursement procedures are quite troublesome. It would be great if RMB payment is supported.

hrs1989 2022-02-01

It has been over a month since I submitted my article, and it has been "under review" all this time. I heard that RS has a quick review process, so I don't understand why mine is taking so long, especially since I submitted it for a special issue.

洛霖 2022-01-25

Pending review 2021.12.11 (Saturday)
Under review 2021.12.13 (Monday)
Comments of reviewer#1 2021.12.14
Comments of reviewer#2 2021.12.28
Pending decision 2021.12.28
Comments of reviewer#3 2021.12.30
Pending major revisions 2021.12.31 (10 days to complete)
Revised version review 2022.1.10 (Monday)
Pending editor decision 2022.1.14 (Friday)
Accepted 2022.1.18
Pending English 2022.1.18 (Tuesday)
Author proofreading 2022.1.19
Pending conversion 2022.1.20
Website Online 2022.1.20

旺仔加油 2022-01-24

The senior sister in the neighboring laboratory seems to have graduated by relying on "rs".

zitian 2022-01-24

I also noticed that the template requires a 200-word abstract, but the instructions to the author require a 300-word abstract. I submitted a draft with 200-300 words, but the outcome of the under review process is currently unknown (hoping for a revision~).

lingbaishi 2022-01-23

Yes, I just submitted a doctoral application.

lilyli 2022-01-20

Hello, I would like to ask if you noticed that the submission requirements state that the abstract should be within 200 words, but the accepted abstracts are around 300 words. Did you pay attention to this when you submitted yours? Sorry to bother you.

lilyli 2022-01-20

Hello, I would like to ask if I understand correctly that the abstract word limit for submissions is within 200 words, but the accepted abstracts are around 300 words. Did you pay attention to this when submitting? Sorry to bother you.

catherine_soilscience 2022-01-19

Submission Experience:
2021.8.19 submit
2021.9.8 major revision Due to being pregnant and awaiting childbirth at that time, I requested a two-month extension to submit. The editor asked for the revised version to be submitted as a new manuscript, but it would still be sent to the original reviewers. It is equivalent to resubmission.
2021.11.29 resubmit
2021.12.15 major revision. One of the original three reviewers no longer reviewed, so the editor found a new reviewer. After a few days, the opinions of the fourth reviewer were received. Although it was sent to the original reviewers, two additional reviewers were also included. The manuscript went through a total of five reviewers. Revised within 10 days.
2021.12.25 resubmit
2021.12.29 minor revision
2021.12.31 resubmit
2022.1.12 accepted During this period, the editor was on vacation, so the response was slightly delayed.
2022.1.15 website online

ym666 2022-01-18

12.07 Submission
12.31 Major revision (both require additional details and results)
01.03 Third reviewer major revision (add an unmentioned validation experiment)
01.09 Submission of revisions
01.17 Acceptance
The opinions of all three reviewers were fair, and I only felt relieved after seeing the list of warnings. ┓( ´∀` )┏

lilyli 2022-01-16

Hello, could you please tell me how long it took for you to receive rejection letters after submitting?

Guangxi Liu 2022-01-10

we are writing to inform you that your submission has been rejected in the initial review...

洛霖 2022-01-09

Seriously, now everything is so easy. Still want to apply for a doctoral program in RS.

遥感小硕 2022-01-09

Wuhan University has already issued multiple notifications stating that the RS award and accolades will not be counted, and some colleges even no longer recognize the RS as a graduation qualification paper.

ieeeho 2021-12-28

10.29 submitted
11.01 under view
12.01 major revisions, three reviewers, two positive opinions, one requested addition of comparative experiments
12.15 resubmitted, requested one-week extension
12.16 pending editor decision
12.24 minor revisions, resubmitted
12.25 pending editor decision
12.28 paper accepted

洛霖 2021-12-21

I want to ask if pending English is chargeable or if the editors there will directly review it for you.

没有名字_无名 2021-12-21

After confirming, the total number of publications in the three major remote sensing journals in 2020 is around 1500. It was over 4000 last year and is still increasing this year, which is truly an unappealing sight.

没有名字_无名 2021-12-21

The number of articles published in 2021 has exceeded 5000, and surpassing 6000 is within reach. Compared to the total annual publication volume of around 2000 in the top three remote sensing journals, we should be mentally prepared for remote sensing to become a highly influential journal.

jiaxiwang 2021-12-21

The translation of the text into English is as follows:

"The speed is very fast, and the general process is as follows. Previously, it was rejected when submitted to STOTEN, so it was changed to be submitted to remote sensing. The first English contribution in my life was given to MDPI.
2021.11.08 submitted
2021.11.26 minor revision
2021.12.05 revised version submitted
2021.12.09 accepted
2021.12.10 proofreading
2021.12.11 proofreading resubmitted
2021.12.13 published online
Good luck to everyone."

ohuo 2021-12-21

"Top可还行？？？？" translates to "Is top still good?" in English.

FRSAC 2021-12-20

Although it is a top journal in the second district, the self-citation rate is too high, and the number of annual articles is too high. We must remind the magazine manager that continuing like this will follow in the footsteps of IEEE ACCESS and sensors. It is desirable but should not be unattractive.

小吕布 2021-12-20

This year, the basic edition is also a top 2 district! Last year, it was only a 2 district!

碧海蓝天WGP 2021-12-20

Is this year's upgraded version also 2nd district top, just like last year?

碧海蓝天WGP 2021-12-20

When was the 2021 CAS division released?

Giser-SJH 2021-12-20

The 2021 Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) classification table has been released! Both the basic version and the enhanced version still place Remote Sensing in Zone 2.

helloworld123 2021-12-19

Special issue
11.27 Submitted, Pending review
11.29 Under review
12.13 Minor revision, received comments from 2 reviewers, requested to submit within 5 days
12.15 Received comments from the 3rd reviewer
12.16 Resubmitted
12.17 Pending editor decision
12.18 Accepted; Pending English
12.19 English correction done

The Müller Award 2021-12-19

The self-cited academic journal "疯狂自引的大水刊" unexpectedly turned out to be one of the top journals in the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). The ranking of CAS is really absurd!