peike 2023-07-10

Indeed, most of the references are for part D, but the editor rejected it immediately, saying it is not within the scope of the journal. Disgusting.

fslxjzc 2022-10-25

There are too many articles that I have written on this topic, and the editor rejected them directly. However, a few days ago, I was asked to review a similar research article with outdated methods and no innovation, but it was successfully submitted for review. Could it be because it was too long (over 60 pages with only a few pages of valuable information) and the editor didn't want to read it carefully? The journal is definitely still a good journal, with its impact factor increasing every year.

科研辣鸡 2022-08-26

The language requirement is high, the quality requirement is high, but the impact factor and partition are average.
If there is a slight problem, it needs to be revised and resubmitted, which is a bit troublesome and requires patience. It took four submissions and one month to be successfully published.
The speed is relatively slow, and in the case of very good review comments, the cycle is more than 4 months, not 3 months.