大熊猫doctor 2023-07-12

May I ask if this magazine requires WB full film?

顺子 2023-02-19

Soon, submitted on January 12th, returned for revision on January 26th, completed modifications and submitted around February 4th, officially accepted on February 17th, online! The efficiency of this journal is truly impressive!

DDddd1 2023-02-17

May I ask if you need to improve the WB original strip?

kingsley 2021-10-27

1. This magazine does not require line numbers, which delayed me for two days.
2. The reviewer seems to not be very specialized in this field, but they have a solid understanding of grammar, formatting, and conceptual issues in the discussion. After the modifications, the article feels more complete.
3. The editor will check past articles. My junior fellow student had a better publication of the same kind, so in comparison, the editor felt that this article lacked quality (actually, my junior fellow student's article had a name attached to it, haha, how unfortunate).
4. The review process is really fast, so people in a hurry can give it a try.
5. I wish the magazine continued to prosper.

北北 2021-09-08

5.3 submit
5.4 with editor
5.6 under review
6.29 minor revise
7.22 resubmit manuscript
7.24 with editor
7.31 under review
8.22 required reviews completed
8.23 accept
The journal editor is very responsible and feels great. Let's build the building together!

waker 2021-06-16

Fast speed, complicated editing. After my first submission was rejected, the reviewer was terrible. I argued a bit through email and finally the editor allowed me to resubmit for another review. After some modifications, it was accepted. It just goes to show that there are all kinds of reviewers out there. However, I'm a bit worried that toxicology articles after February are not included in Web of Science (WoS).