Verified Reviews - SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
风雅颂5415 2023-08-04
April 16, 2023 - Submitted
April 18, 2023 - With editor
April 22, 2023 - Under-review
May 8, 2023 - First reviewer's comments completed
May 10, 2023 - All reviewers' comments completed (four reviewers)
May 24, 2023 - Rejected
June 28, 2023 - Revised according to comments and communicated with editor for re-review
July 8, 2023 - First reviewer completed (second reviewer never accepted the review)
July 30, 2023 - Accepted directly (one reviewer's comments led to direct acceptance)
August 1, 2023 - Available online
mreosng 2023-08-01
In less than two months, I submitted it on June 3rd and was accepted on August 1st. The editing process was extremely fast. Yesterday, I saw that reviewer 2 had not completed the review on the tracking link, but today it was accepted. I haven't even seen the DEC in Pros yet. It's a miraculous publication for graduation.
两年 2023-07-24
Excuse me, who is the editor?
mreosng 2023-07-15
Without simulation, there is experimental characterization.
lixinying 2023-07-12
Brother, is your article structured as a combination of simulation and experiment? I see that many articles on Energy follow this approach. Is there any specific explanation for this?
mreosng 2023-07-10
The journal review process was very fast. I submitted it on June 3rd. On July 3rd, I received the revision comments from three reviewers. Two of the reviewers directly praised my English writing, which was the first time in my life that a reviewer complimented my English. The three reviewers had a total of 31 revision comments, but most of them were minor changes, such as spelling errors and increasing the size of certain icons. I immediately made the revisions and submitted them again, hoping for a good outcome.
mossW 2023-07-01
5.1 Submission, minor revision by reviewers, major revision by editor, accepted after one week of modifications, accepted on 6.30, exactly two months. The speed of review by the editor was very fast, although there was a reviewer who accepted the review but did not provide results for a long time. The editor's responses to email inquiries were also very prompt, making it a quite good submission experience.
向宽处行 2023-06-30
Major repairs, modifications have been submitted.
Z.Q. 2023-06-30
This editor is quite slow in handling the manuscript. The review and second review were delayed for more than a month, and it took two reminders before it was processed.
bill90 2023-06-26
6.25 submitted to journal
6.26 With editor
I don't know much about this journal, it doesn't seem very well-known. I'm surprised it suddenly became a top-tier journal. However, with an impact factor of 4+, it still offers good value for money. I'm not sure about the speed of the review process though. I submitted to the Fuel journal with an editor two months ago, and cautiously inquired about the status. As soon as I asked, it got rejected. Later, I submitted to a few others, but they were also quite slow and rejected as soon as I inquired. I don't want to wait for so long, can't they be more efficient?
bill90 2023-06-25
If you really want to submit it, don't rush, don't rush, don't rush. Rushing the manuscript will lead to rejection, no matter what, it will be rejected. Even if I promise to review it after rushing, I will find a reason to reject it in a couple of days. Of course, it will be another journal. Other journals will handle it immediately (by rejecting) as soon as it is rushed.
BLANK MS 2023-06-12
04 Apr. 2023 submit;
02 May 2023 major revision;
17 May 2023 revised submit;
02 Jun. 2023 minor revision (1 comment);
02 Jun. 2023 revised submit;
06 Jun. 2023 accept.
The reviewer is very professional, and their comments are highly valuable. Editor H.C. Man is efficient. Best wishes for the journal's continued success!
向宽处行 2023-06-02
Submitted, waiting.
Thank you to the editor and reviewers.
.Clover 2023-05-16
09 Jan 2023 submit
22 Apr 2023 minor revision (9 comments from three reviewers)
15 Mar 2023 accept
More emphasis on innovation, the efficiency is indeed high
01鬼画符 2023-05-15
2.25 Submission
4.13 Major revision (20 days for revision, two reviewers, one minor revision and one major revision, a total of 7 comments)
5.4 Revision submitted to journal
5.15 Accept
Jinchao Zhao 2023-05-11
No layout fee needed.
xyhxyh 2023-05-11
hxd, how much is the page fee?
YSWT 2023-05-08
02 Mar 2023: Submission to journal
03 Mar 2023: Sent to editor
06 Mar 2023: Under review
18 Mar 2023: Major revision (20 days for revisions, 3 reviewers with 14 comments)
03 Apr 2023: Revision submitted to journal
07 Apr 2023: Under review
07 May 2023: Accepted
Jinchao Zhao 2023-05-08
09 Feb 2023 Submit to journal
10 Feb 2023 With Editor
12 Feb 2023 Under Review
07 Mar 2023 Required review completed
30 Mar 2023 Major revision (20 days for revision, 9 comments from two reviewers)
17 Apr 2023 Revision Submitted to Journal
07 May 2023 Accept
menghui 2023-04-28
3.6 submitted to journal
3.7 with editor
3.8 under review
3.25 major revision (Three reviewers and the editor provided a total of 39 comments, with two being positive and one neutral. One reviewer provided over twenty detailed and professional comments. The major revision was given a 20-day revision period, as additional experiments needed to be conducted. However, the revision period was extended by one week after a request was made in a letter.)
4.16 revision submitted and sent for review on the same day
4.26 required reviews complete
4.27 minor revision (The reviewers had no issues, but the editor provided a few minor comments on the title)
4.27 revision submitted/with editor
4.28 accept
The speed at which editor H. C. Man handled the process was very fast. The major revision took over twenty days, but after the revision, the quality of the article significantly improved.
不喝百事的肥宅 2023-04-27
4.2 Submission
4.4 Under review
4.6 Under review by three reviewers
4.16 One review completed
4.12 Two reviews completed, required reviews complete
4.26 Rejected
The opinions of the three reviewers were one major revision and one minor revision. The final reviewer rejected the paper, stating that although my work was systematic, it was relatively simple. The editor agreed with the rejection.
This is my first sci paper in life. The result came quickly, but I feel disappointed. I think it could have been given an opportunity for major revision, but the editor wants to maintain the quality of the journal articles.
EBC-APS 2023-04-21
Traducción al español: Enviado el 1 de marzo de 2023
Revisión importante el 8 de abril de 2023
Artículo aceptado el 19 de abril de 2023
xiaojianrong531 2023-04-16
06 Jan 2023 Submitted to Journal
08 Jan 2023 With editor
09 Jan 2023 Under Review
30 Jan 2023 Required Reviews Complete
31 Jan 2023 Required Reviews Complete
02 Feb 2023 Required Reviews Complete
03 Feb 2023 Major Revisions (4 reviewers, 3 major revisions, 1 rejection, editor requested major revisions; 42 comments from reviewers, added a lot of content, requested a 5-week extension; diligently responded to comments, 35 pages in font size 5)
28 Mar 2023 Revision Submitted/With Editor
29 Mar 2023 Under Review
10 Apr 2023 Revise (1 reviewer provided 3 comments, the one who rejected it)
14 Apr 2023 Revision Submitted/With Editor
16 Apr 2023 Accepted (presumably editor accepted it directly)
mong 2023-03-25
2.19 submitted
2.21 under review (two reviewers, five comments)
3.16 minor revision
3.20 revision submitted
3.25 accept
撒盐少女 2023-03-24
Submitted on October 16, 2022, rejected on March 24, 2023, with an interval of nearly five months. Two reminders were sent during this period. It was a frustrating submission experience.
喃喃学语 2023-03-13
May I ask what direction you are investing in? Mine is the combination of metal and carbon materials used in the field of catalysis. It may not be very innovative, is that acceptable?
张亚龙 2023-03-09
My manuscript was accepted on February 20th, but I still haven't received the proof yet. It has been 20 days already. Could you please advise on how to proceed?
张亚龙 2023-03-09
Received on February 20th, until now there is still no proof. It has been 20 days already. May I ask how to proceed?
叶密立 2023-03-06
The following text is translated into English: The manuscript I uploaded at that time (revised draft for resubmission), manuscript (revised clean and final) (revised draft with marks for secondary resubmission), revised manuscript file (revised draft with marks for secondary resubmission), for everyone's reference.
wzhang318 2023-03-06
Hello, what should be uploaded for these three files? Have you solved this problem? Now I am also submitting a repair request, but I don't know how to submit it.
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started