Verified Reviews - STATISTICA SINICA
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

lei666 2022-04-25

The length of the review time is truly disgusting for people.

lei666 2022-04-25

This journal is extremely friendly towards experts. If you are not an expert or do not have an expert's endorsement, don't waste your time. At the same time, this journal is very neglectful towards newcomers' reviews, taking too long to provide feedback. It takes more than eight months from submission to rejection. Furthermore, experts in my field can easily submit to this journal, even if their algorithm proofs contain obvious errors. No wonder this journal has a low impact factor; it seems that the reviewers are unable to review when they see a paper from an expert, but become arrogant and display their "expert" demeanor when they see a paper from a newcomer.

taryue 2021-08-04

Very good theoretical journal, although the domestic division is extremely unfriendly to it.

yangyangli 2021-03-17

Submitted in September 2018, underwent major revisions in July 2019, accepted in February 2020, and proofs received in March 2021. In the field of statistics, STATISTICA SINICA is considered as one of the top-tier journals. This journal is friendly towards renowned researchers, but can be strict towards unknown newcomers in the field of scientific research. The review process is long and the impact factor is low. Therefore, it is advised to carefully consider before submitting your work.

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now