CQDs 2022-10-13

On the afternoon of October 8th, the status changed to "With Editor". As of October 13th, the status is still "With Editor". I noticed in the comments that it's difficult to find reviewers in the field of spectroscopy and analytical chemistry. This journal is also classified under spectroscopy, which is quite ridiculous, isn't it? I'm in a hurry to publish, and it has been almost half a month wasted. I can't submit elsewhere yet, it's really frustrating!

redaiyulin 2022-10-11

Tragic... However, it doesn't have much to do with me urging for the manuscript.
See if you can find out which editor it is, and then contact them directly on the official website.

CQDs 2022-10-08

Posted on October 2nd, still showing "With Managing Editor" on October 8th, the processing speed of the manuscript is touching.

John117 2022-10-06

Posted on April 9th
Received revision comments on April 21st, from one reviewer, with 9 comments
Returned the revised manuscript on May 10th
Accepted on May 24th
The theoretical analysis should be as thorough as possible, so there should be no problem.

weishanshan 2022-09-29

2022.08.23 under review
2022.08.31 under review
2022.09.12 under review
2022.09.16 required review completed
2022.09.20 revise
2022.09.22 revision submitted to journal
2022.09.23 with editor
2022.09.28 under review

Translated text:
2022.08.23 under review
2022.08.31 under review
2022.09.12 under review
2022.09.16 required review completed
2022.09.20 revise
2022.09.22 revision submitted to journal
2022.09.23 with editor
2022.09.28 under review

Scientificgarbage 2022-09-28

The review process is so slow. It started in early August, and now it's already September 28th, and only one reviewer has completed the review. The others haven't agreed to review yet. Can anyone suggest how to remind the editor?

Scientificgarbage 2022-09-28

May I ask how the result turned out? How can I get in touch with the editor to urge the submission?

redaiyulin 2022-09-13

Yesterday I reminded the editor, and as a result, they made a decision directly in a situation with only one reviewer. I truly hope it turns out to be good luck...

redaiyulin 2022-09-08

9.2 under review
The editor is very responsible, but it is difficult to find reviewers.

55662019 2022-08-22

It has been one month since the submission and it is still under review.

kdxjlm 2022-08-19

It cannot be done within half a year.

weishanshan 2022-08-19

2022.07.18 with managing editor
2022.07.21 assigned manuscript number, with editor
2022.7.27 under review
2022.08.06 under review
2022.08.07 under review

redaiyulin 2022-08-18

It's really amazing. The first two reviewers coincidentally did not provide any feedback. The deadline for the third reviewer's review is also approaching, and there is still no response. Could there be something wrong with my article? Helpless, but I have to say that the editor is still very responsible~~

John117 2022-08-17

Just make detailed revisions to the original text based on the opportunity given for modifications, and thoroughly address the person's suggestions. That's it. Then, tell the rejecting reviewer, "The author has made revisions to the original text, which seems ready for publication, but it still requires some editing for grammar and punctuation."

As long as you make changes diligently, provide thorough responses, and maintain a sincere attitude, there is a chance!

zrr1 2022-08-06

How is it going now? Has it been reviewed?

redaiyulin 2022-08-02

7.29 The editor sent a new invitation to the reviewers.
7.30 A reviewer accepted the submission.

大盘兔子吖 2022-07-28

Is the revised version sent back to the original expert for reevaluation? How do you convince the one who rejected it?

大盘兔子吖 2022-07-28

Is the second review given to the original expert? How did they convince the expert who rejected it?

redaiyulin 2022-07-18

Currently, there is no news from the two reviewers. The manuscript was submitted before May 29th, and as far as I know, the review period for this journal is 20 days. Therefore, I am feeling helpless and plan to inquire with the editor in a few more days.

yangdianyixue 2022-07-17

May I ask how are you now?

yangdianyixue 2022-07-16

Yeah, me too. Why though?

redaiyulin 2022-06-20

It has been nearly a month since submission, and the reviewers have not yet returned their comments. Praying!!!

阿宝vs汤大基 2022-06-17

2022.03.11 submitted
2022.03.20 with editor
2022.04.05 returned, given 2 months to revise
2022.04.25 returned for additional experiment
2022.05.10 required review completed
2022.05.11 accepted

Very fast, wishing the journal continued success!

redaiyulin 2022-06-08

2022.5.18 submit
5.21 with editor
5.24 under review

Translation:

Submitted on May 18th, 2022.
With editor on May 21st.
Under review on May 24th.

gigigigigigi 2022-06-04

I have been in this state for a month, even though I have already submitted it, still with the editor.

gigigigigigi 2022-06-04

What to do if there is no news after one month of submission?

kdxjlm 2022-06-01

How long does the first trial take?

Oumuamua 2022-05-28

Submission: March 9, 2022
Review completed: April 16, 2022
Revision: May 12, 2022
Acceptance: May 23, 2022

随他吧！。。 2022-05-24

Could you please clarify if "Questions to authors" requires only answering the questions or if it also requires modifying the content of the article based on the questions?

暴躁的土豆地雷 2022-04-14

Posted on January 18, 2022.
Review took one month.
Experiment delayed due to the pandemic.
Revised manuscript replied on March 23.
Accepted on March 28.
The speed is still very fast.