Verified Reviews - POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
灌水老先生 2023-05-30
Are there any knowledgeable buddies?
灌水老先生 2023-05-25
Does this journal not accept papers related to heavy metals? I have searched all around and haven't found any. Are they also not accepting papers on food safety related to heavy metal pollution?
caicaicaicaigou 2023-03-26
Can I ask if this journal will review interdisciplinary research on artificial intelligence and agriculture quickly?
Kiiii 2023-02-02
The journal's review speed and response time are quite fast. It took three revisions for my paper to be accepted, so that's why it took so long.
July 13, 2022 (evening): Submitted initial draft
July 14, 2022 (morning): Editor returned the draft and requested formatting changes
July 20, 2022 (evening): Submitted revised draft
July 21, 2022: Under review by editor
July 23, 2022: Under review
August 10, 2022: Under review by editor
August 11, 2022: Under review
September 2, 2022: Decision in process
September 7, 2022: Major revision requested
October 21, 2022: Submitted revised draft to editor
October 24, 2022: Under review
November 16, 2022: Decision in process
November 18, 2022: Major revision requested
December 20, 2022: Submitted revised draft to editor
December 27, 2022: Minor revision requested
January 27, 2023: Submitted revised draft to editor
January 29, 2023: Decision in process
January 30, 2023: Accepted
Kiiii 2023-02-02
Already received, I opened a new floor.
Kiiii 2023-02-02
The journal's response and review speed are quite fast. My paper went through three revisions before it was accepted, so that's why it took so long.
2022/7/13 evening: Submitted initial draft
2022/7/14 morning: Returned by editor, requested formatting revisions
2022/7/20 evening: Submitted revised version
2022/7/21: With editor
2022/7/23: Under review
2022/8/10: With editor
2022/8/11: Under review
2022/9/02: Decision in process
2022/9/07: Major revision
2022/10/21: Submitted revised version, with editor
2022/10/24: Under review
2022/11/16: Decision in process
2022/11/18: Major revision
2022/12/20: Submitted revised version, with editor
2022/12/27: Minor revision
2023/01/27: Submitted revised version, with editor
2023/01/29: Decision in process
2023/01/30: Accept
酒酒无憾 2022-12-06
2022.8.15 Submission
2022.8.16 Under review
2022.9.1 Under review
2022.9.15 Under review
2022.9.27 Major revision
2022.10.23 Returned and still with editor
2022.11.13 Major revision
2022.11.19 Returned and still with editor
2022.12.5 Minor revision
2022.12.6 Returned with editor
2022.12.6 Accepted
The editor is very responsible and has high requirements for the writing of the article. The deputy editor also has a lot of power. Of course, the deputy editor is also very nice and provides many small suggestions to improve the quality of the article. This is my second article published in this journal, and I will prioritize considering this journal for future good results.
李鑫茂 2022-12-05
2022.10.30 Submission
2022.11.1 Format editing and revision
2022.11.3 Resubmission
2022.11.30 Major revision
2022.12.3 Return
2022.12.5 Acceptance
The editor is very responsible and the processing speed is very fast. The reviewer's comments are very accurate. It's the top publication and it gave me some confidence!!! The journal is getting better and better!!!!
ssccnnbb 2022-12-01
11.11 submitted for review, but no one has reviewed it until now...
ssccnnbb 2022-11-10
What is the final result? Are you the chief editor? I have been with the editor for nearly a month and there has been no progress.
Kiiii 2022-09-05
2022/7/20 - Submit initial draft
2022/7/21 - With editor
2022/7/23 - Under review
2022/8/10 - With editor
2022/8/11 - Under review
2022/9/02 - Decision in process
Looking forward to the results.
酒酒无憾 2022-01-14
Aug 27, 2021 Submit
Aug 29, 2021 Under Review
Sep 13, 2021 Under Review
Sep 21, 2021 Under Review
Sep 28, 2021 Under Review
Oct 15, 2021 Under Review
Nov 16, 2021 Major Revision
Dec 19, 2021 Major Revision
Jan 12, 2022 Minor Revision
Jan 13, 2022 Accept
Overall, the journal's speed is quite fast. The section I submitted to has been relatively slow among all the editors. The review period has been constantly changing, probably due to the difficulty in finding suitable reviewers. After the first major revision, the editor did not submit it for review again. The editor is an expert in the field and reviewed it themselves, providing a major revision. It was returned for further revisions on Christmas Day, likely because the editor took time off for Christmas. It took another two weeks for the editor to provide minor revisions, and it was accepted on the same day as the minor revisions. The speed was still quite fast.
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now