Verified Reviews - POLYMER
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

DJ-a 2022-10-14

2022.08.08 Submission
2022.09.14 Reviewer's comments returned
2022.10.06 Revised manuscript returned
2022.10.14 Accepted

科研追星one 2022-10-14

2022.08.08 Submission
2022.09.10 Reviewer's Comments Returned
2022.09.22 Major Revision Returned
2022.10.02 Reviewer's Comments Returned Again
2022.10.05 Minor Revision Returned
2022.10.07 Accepted

沈1111 2022-10-09

8.12 Submission
8.23 under review (10.6 date changed once)

HH6610 2022-10-07

Translate the following text into English:

9.29 Submission
9.30 With editor
10.7 Still with editor
I want to ask everyone, after the paper is in the hands of the editor, how long does it take to be rejected or sent for review?

logv52 2022-09-30

September 26, submission
September 28, transformation
The editing was still very fast, even though it was rejected, but I suggest resubmitting.

qian 2022-09-11

Hey, classmate, has your situation changed? How long do you want to be with (someone/something)? Mine has also remained the same.

夏至未央 2022-09-08

I also received this email and would like to ask if the email used for registration when submitting a manuscript to Polymer must be from a school or institution. Urgent response needed!

夏至未央 2022-09-08

I want to ask you experts, when submitting to Polymer, is it necessary for the registered email to be from an institution or school? I have changed all the corresponding author emails in the system to my school email (only the personal email used for submission registration), but the journal still sent me an email asking to change it to a school email. I would like to consult what is going on.

夏至未央 2022-09-06

I also want to consult. I am also submitting to Polymer, but I am currently using a personal email for submission registration. I changed the author information in the system and the corresponding author in the article to the institutional email. I'm not sure if this is acceptable. Should I use an institutional email for submission registration as well?

melody 2022-08-30

A Japanese editor.

xyzh 2022-08-29

Who handled the editing?

melody 2022-08-26

2022.2.17 submitted
2.19 under review
4.30 major revision
5.11 revision submitted
5.14 under review
6.14 reminder for manuscript
6.19 accept
6.20 online
6.23 proofreading
6.25 pagination

科研废柴dog 2022-08-19

6.13 Submitted, still Under Review now.

xyzh 2022-08-18

From July 12 until now, I have been with the editor all along. Brothers, how are you all doing? It's so slow!

王一投 2022-08-14

Hello, Brother Taiping, I also encountered this problem. Could you please tell me how you solved it? Thank you.

薰衣 2022-08-10

Hello, may I trouble you to ask how long the process of receiving proof for your article usually takes? It has been half a month since I received it and I haven't received any proof yet. Is this normal? Thank you.

薰衣 2022-08-10

Hello, may I ask how long does it usually take for you to receive a proof for your article? It has been half a month and I still haven't received any updates, is this normal?

@逆行者 2022-07-31

Assigned to Liu Dongsheng for editing

为盛世开太平 2022-07-06

I would like to consult about something. Recently, I submitted an article to Polymer, but the system keeps telling me that the corresponding author needs to use an institutional email instead of a personal one. I have already changed the corresponding author's email to the one provided by the school. What's the matter? I would like to inquire about it.

为盛世开太平 2022-07-06

I would like to inquire about something. I recently submitted an article to Polymer, but the system keeps telling me that the corresponding author needs to provide an organizational email instead of a personal email. I have already changed the corresponding author's email to the one provided by the school. What's going on? I would like to know.

advanced soft materials 2022-07-04

Hey, as long as it's assigned to him, it won't be reviewed. 90% of the pieces assigned to other editors have been reviewed and accepted. I thought he had a bias against our team!

advanced soft materials 2022-07-04

When it was delivered to Liu Dongsheng, it was not sent for approval.
It was instead submitted to Materials Today Physics.
Is Professor Liu being too strict with the Chinese?

HAhahahahSA1 2022-05-25

Received at Editorial Office 28 Feb 2022
Article revised 18 May 2022
Article accepted for publication 24 May 2022
The article was submitted to Professor Michael S. Silverstein, who handled the manuscript promptly.

一区区区区区 2022-05-23

The text "4.28投的,现在还是with editor" translates to "Submitted on April 28th, currently still with editor" in English.

dudupipi 2022-05-13

No need to rush for the manuscript, it has only been under review for a month. It took two and a half months for my manuscript to come back with review comments.

薰衣 2022-05-13

Hello, I would like to know how long it usually takes to receive a response after two months of being under review for the Polymer journal, which you submitted in the second half of 2021. Did you end up sending a reminder? I submitted my article to Polymer on April 5th, 2022, and it has been under review since April 10th until May 13th. I am considering whether to send a reminder and I am looking forward to your reply. Thank you!

dudupipi 2022-05-05

5.4 ACCEPT translates to "accept" in English.

Mircea 2022-04-26

Received Date: 19 March 2022
Revised Date: 20 April 2022
Accepted Date: 23 April 2022
Two reviewers, one mentioned that the article analysis is clear, while the other praised it as excellent. After making minor revisions, the article was accepted on the third day.

dudupipi 2022-04-17

3.28 Révision soumise
3.30 Avec l'éditeur

Translation:
3.28 Revision submitted
3.30 With the editor

dudupipi 2022-03-20

3.19 Major revision

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started