Verified Reviews - NEUROIMAGE
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

小耗子 2023-08-09

I have been with the editor for over two months, and it still hasn't been reviewed. I feel hopeless!

FrankPub 2022-07-15

Submitted on December 28, 2021;
Notified of major revisions three months later;
Returned for minor revisions in June;
Accepted on July 11, 2022.

Both reviewers asked professional questions, with one being particularly meticulous. After half a year of submission, it was finally accepted.

这个这个这个 2022-06-07

Received by the editor, the article was sent for review after 4 days. The first review result was given after 2 months, followed by major revisions which were accepted one month later. There were three reviewers, one of whom provided 8 very high-level comments but no suggestions, another gave two suggestions for acceptance, and the third had no suggestions but recommended acceptance. The editor requested major revisions, which were completed and accepted after one month. The review process was fast, and the reviewers demonstrated a high level of expertise.

这个这个这个 2022-05-31

With the editor, it usually takes about two weeks. After the editor approves it, it is sent for review. Rejections are also typically given within two weeks. The speed is considered quite fast.

alex_zhao_zi 2022-04-14

First job in reading a doctorate... The reviewer's comments are constructive. However, as I read more papers, I found that the quality of the content varies. In the future, I will continue to consider submitting some small works or unsatisfactory results to this journal.

幸毛虎 2021-06-09

The first SCI paper of my life was rejected after two months. The feedback was quite good, but I am not skilled enough.

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started