Verified Reviews - MEDICAL PHYSICS
susuloveforever 2023-05-25
The total time taken was 5 and a half months, and I received the acceptance notification. The first review took two and a half months (due to the longer duration of winter vacation), and after receiving the feedback, I spent two months on revisions. The second round of review took one month and was accepted.
天降好文 2023-05-19
May I ask how things are going now?
天降好文 2023-05-19
It has been three months under review, and there is still no news. They have not replied to my emails either. Has anyone experienced a similar situation? What happened in the end?
L_xiao 2023-05-16
Excuse me, what is the current status? I feel so slow, so slow.
susuloveforever 2023-03-27
My first trial time is two and a half months, and there is winter vacation in between, so the time is a bit long.
susuloveforever 2023-03-23
May I ask where did you find the PACS code for Med.Phys? I have searched through the homepage and writing requirements but couldn't find it.
susuloveforever 2023-03-23
The speed of the first review is too slow, and the journal has very strict requirements.
Frrest_chen 2023-03-07
I have previously mentioned that out of the 5 articles I submitted, two of them received major revisions. Today, the second major revision was reviewed and only minor revisions were suggested. I can clearly feel that the requirements of this journal for the year 2022 have increased. There is another journal called "Physics in Medicine and Biology" at a similar level, but it is much easier in terms of difficulty compared to this one. American journals are still much more difficult than those in Europe, so everyone should be cautious when submitting manuscripts.
Frrest_chen 2023-03-06
I encountered this situation where both reviewers gave positive feedback, but the Associate Editor wanted me to resubmit and the Deputy Editor suggested major revisions. The Associate Editor took 12 days to evaluate, while the Deputy Editor took 15 days. I have submitted a total of 5 articles to this journal, and two of them were given major revisions.
lululu 2023-03-05
How long have you been the deputy editor? What is the current situation?
dd 2023-02-07
My four months under review.
死鬼001 2023-02-07
Once again, under review, it's really funny. If you're going to reject it, reject it quickly. You can also consider investing in something else.
dd 2023-02-06
I am speechless. It has been 4 months, and there has been no sign of any movement.
死鬼001 2023-02-05
It has been 3 months, and there has been no progress at all.
Editorial Evaluation - Associate Editor 29-Nov-2022 12:54:03
Under Review 20-Oct-2022 02:33:23
Initial QC Complete 20-Oct-2022 02:33:23
Initial QC Started 19-Oct-2022 22:18:55
Author-Approved Files Submitted 19-Oct-2022 22:18:54
Preliminary Manuscript Data Posted 19-Oct-2022 10:15:56
摆脱科研小白 2023-01-28
I would like to ask the experts how to obtain the approval of the ethics committee for designing a human body report.
dd 2023-01-23
So it was like this, thank you very much, Happy New Year!
人生四季的微笑 2023-01-23
"Under review" should indicate that it has already been sent for external review but has not been completed yet. When my submission was under review for the first time, it also took a long time. I had emailed to inquire about the delay and was informed that the initial external reviewer had abandoned the review process midway, so they had to find another one, resulting in the slow progress of the first review. It's really frustrating.
dd 2023-01-20
What is the status displayed when you review it? Mine has been "under review" for three months, does that mean it hasn't been sent for external review yet?
人生四季的微笑 2023-01-19
The reviewer probably reviewed for about two months, and then it returned to the hands of the editor and remained stagnant. It's so torturous.
dd 2023-01-17
Hello, may I ask how much time it took from your submission to the end of the first review? It has been three months since I submitted my work and I haven't heard anything. Also, were you under review status until the end of the first review?
人生四季的微笑 2023-01-16
After the reviewer completed the review, the status changed to "Editorial Evaluation - Deputy Editor". It has been over a month and there has been no progress at this point. I have sent reminder emails but have not received any replies. Has anyone else encountered the same situation?
鹿酱 2022-12-15
May I ask if the original poster was in the "under review" status before receiving the first review comments? It has been almost two months since the submission, and it has been stuck in this status. I have sent emails but haven't received any response.
Cro 2022-09-14
Hello, I would like to ask why the LaTeX template provided on the official website is single-column, while the distribution version is double-column.
菜博 2022-08-03
The first review took 2 months to complete, with two reviewers providing detailed comments. It took some time to address the comments, resulting in another 2 months of revision. After resubmission, it was accepted within a month.
xiaoliaikeyan 2022-07-30
Why is your review process so fast? I have been waiting for three months without any information. It seems like it is still in the hands of the editor and has not been sent for external review. It is difficult to endure.
xiaoliaikeyan 2022-07-30
Too slow, it's been three months and the situation hasn't changed. I wrote a reminder letter once, but it didn't help much. It's so agonizing, I urgently need to graduate, so please be cautious when considering this.
Cassiv 2022-06-23
2021.12.11 Submission
2022.3.8 Received review comments, the comments are very pertinent
2022.4.6 Submitted revised version, made changes point by point, added quite a few experiments
2022.6.13 Received acceptance notice
dsfsdf 2022-03-01
The revision suggestions are quite sharp, just make the revisions carefully based on the peer review comments.
论文recept 2022-02-14
Hello blogger, recently I also plan to submit to medical physics. I would like to ask if there is any paper template for the first submission to this journal?
yyy1 2021-12-21
May I ask how long the "under consideration-editor office" status has been ongoing?
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now